Thaddeus McCotter's Statement In Support Of Loan To Automobile Manufacturers
SEARCH BLOG: AUTOMOBILES
Thanks to the McCotter staff.
..
SEARCH BLOG: AUTOMOBILES
Thanks to the McCotter staff.
..
Labels: Economy, Government
Henry Louis Mencken (1880–1956)... and one could add "not all human problems really are."
“The Divine Afflatus,” A Mencken Chrestomathy, chapter 25, p. 443 (1949)
It was beautiful and simple, as truly great swindles are.... The Government is on course for an embarrassing showdown with the European Union, business groups and environmental charities after refusing to guarantee that billions of pounds of revenue it stands to earn from carbon-permit trading will be spent on combating climate change.
- O. Henry
The Independent (UK)
The Federal Reserve sees no need to cut interest rates in the light of adverse recent economic data, Ben Bernanke said on Wednesday.
The Fed chairman said ”to date, the incoming data have supported the view that the current stance of policy is likely to foster sustainable economic growth and a gradual ebbing in core inflation”.July 21, 2007 My guess is that if there is an interest rate change, a cut is more likely than an increase. The key variables to be watching at this point are real estate prices and the inventory of unsold homes.
"Should the elevated turbulence persist, it would increase the possibility of further tightening in financial conditions for households and businesses," he said.December 11, 2007 Somehow the Fed misses the obvious."Uncertainties about the economic outlook are unusually high right now," he said. "These uncertainties require flexible and pragmatic policymaking -- nimble is the adjective I used a few weeks ago."
http://www.reuters.com/
December 13, 2007 [from The Christian Science Monitor]
[Image from: CNNMoney.com]
"The odds of a recession are now above 50 percent," says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com. "We are right on the edge of a recession in part because of the Fed's reluctance to reduce interest rates more aggressively." [see my comments of September 11]January 7, 2008 The real problem now is that consumers can't rescue the economy and manufacturing, which is already weakening, will continue to weaken. We've gutted the forces that could avoid a downturn. The question is not whether there will be a recession, but can it be dampened sufficiently so that it is very short.
“The question is not whether we will have a recession, but how deep and prolonged it will be,” said David Rosenberg, the chief North American economist at Merrill Lynch. “Even if the Fed’s moves are going to work, it will not show up until the later part of 2008 or 2009.”January 17, 2008 A few days ago, Anna Schwartz, nonagenarian economist, implicated the Federal Reserve as the cause of the present lending crisis [from the Telegraph - UK]:
The high priestess of US monetarism - a revered figure at the Fed - says the central bank is itself the chief cause of the credit bubble, and now seems stunned as the consequences of its own actions engulf the financial system. "The new group at the Fed is not equal to the problem that faces it," she says, daring to utter a thought that fellow critics mostly utter sotto voce.January 22, 2008 The cut has become infected and a limb is in danger. Ben Bernanke is panicking and the Fed has its emergency triage team cutting rates... this time by 3/4%. ...
Individuals and businesses need stability in their financial cost structures so that they can plan effectively and keep their ships afloat. Wildly fluctuating rates... regardless of what the absolute levels are... create problems. Either too much spending or too much fear. It's just not that difficult to comprehend. Why has it been so difficult for the Fed?
A national effort has been developed by a company in Michigan where unemployment is at 15+%.

U.S. Budget Deficit
As part of the change aspect of the hope and change regime, the word "government" is being replaced with the new, more hopeful word, "givernment." H/T Al Fin
"George Bush made me do it."US mulls tax on rich to pay for healthcare
By Sarah O’Connor in Washington
Published: July 12 2009 18:51 | Last updated: July 12 2009 21:10
The Obama administration is open to the idea of taxing the wealthiest Americans to pay for healthcare reform, health secretary Kathleen Sebelius suggested yesterday as the House of Representatives prepares to incorporate such a plan in its draft healthcare bill.
| ||
| For Immediate Release Thursday, July 16, 2009 | Contact Information Jameson Cunningham (202) 225-8171 (o) 202-288-2147 (c) |
I believe we have a historic and unique opportunity to address GLOBAL WARMING and vehicle fuel efficiency in a strong national standard that recognizes the overlapping nature of these two issues and acknowledges the expertise that federal and state agencies can bring in addressing them together. Again, thank you for sharing your views with me.
Sincerely, Carl Levin
Listen carefully about the person who pulled together the package and to Sen. McGovern's response to a scientist who wanted the subject thoroughly studied.
Less than two weeks before the agency formally submitted its pro-regulation recommendation to the White House, an EPA center director quashed a 98-page report that warned against making hasty "decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data."
The EPA official, Al McGartland, said in an e-mail message to a staff researcher on March 17: "The administrator and the administration has decided to move forward... and your comments do not help the legal or policy case for this decision."
Contiguous U.S. GISTEMP Linear Trends: Before and After
Guest post by Bob Tisdale
"Many of us have seen gif animations and blink comparators of the older version of Contiguous U.S. GISTEMP data versus the newer version, and here’s yet another one. The presentation is clearer than most."
Two important points:
Historical data are being manipulated to reduce temperatures in the past and increased in the present... thereby showing "warming."Even if you accept the data manipulation, you can show a declining or flat trend from the previous high point 70 years ago... indicating no warming at all!The trend line starts during a particularly cold period thereby guaranteeing a "warming trend."
More HERE.
If the so-called Climate Bill passes Congress and is signed into law, geothermal systems will become immensely popular despite their initial cost... 3 to 4 times conventional energy-efficient heating and cooling systems.
Manufacturers of these systems should see significant increases in demand, while homeowners will see this as an offset to government-forced, more-expensive energy. You won't see more for less, but you will see about the same for about the same... after the 5-7 years it takes to recoup the investment.
From Icecap
http://hallofrecord.blogspot.com/2009/05/natural-gas-fuel-alternative-for-trucks.html
This is actionable with proper governmental leadership. What is not actionable is arbitrarily mandating compliance.
UC Berkeley's [Prof. Harley] Shaiken calls it “remarkably shortsighted” that much of America seems willing to allow “rustbelt” industries to die. He cites China as an economy that has balanced well its manufacturing and high-tech sectors.
“Manufacturing is like the foundation of an economy. It would be like looking at a new skyscraper and saying, ‘What we put in that foundation isn't that important anymore,’” Shaiken says.
“It may be less visible, but it's more important than ever.”and
Why We Need Estimates Of The Current Global Average Radiative Forcing
These failures of the projections (predictions) of the 2007 IPCC report, by themselves, should result in the rejection of the IPCC report as representing settled climate science.
2 comments:
Compelling.
McCotter is a pretty smart cookie.
The question remains.. WITH a bailout (loan), will the automakers remain viable? Will disaster befall anyhow? Money that will still have to be paid back, and the horizon isn't bright given the currently (still) growing GREEN mentality.
I would argue they fail anyhow.
Not only that, but because the money used to "loan" is not even real, it devalues that which the rest of us may have saved. We still wont be able to afford their product, as long as the costs are so high.
Consider this... If a GM Chrysler or a Ford fails.. wouldn't markets drive people to purchase from other manufacturers? Toyota is healthy, as are Honda etc.. They have factories here.
Reality sucks. But sometimes we have to face facts.
See Friday's post for my response.
Post a Comment