During the sentencing proceedings, I did make the point to another man who was there to speak on my friend's behalf that sometimes justice is served by putting a person in jail for a crime... but no one else. In my friend's case, he had lost his job of 30 years, his wife of 35 years, and basically all of his possessions. He was nearly penniless and abandoned. That's serious punishment, but the law does demand more. He had found a new, lower paying job and his new employer told the court that he trusted my friend despite what happened and felt that everyone deserved a second chance. He suggested to the court that a work-release arrangement might be in the best interest of all.
But the judge finally concluded that my friend must serve jail time. The judge did not rush to judgment. He considered all of the ramifications and concluded he had to order jail time for my friend. His sentence was not as harsh as it might have been. It was, no doubt, a very fair and compassionate sentence in light of the crime. Justice is served... the press can send out a message to deter other potential embezzlers. And now...
- my friend loses his job and a chance to rebuild a shattered life
- his new employer loses a person whose talents and knowledge could have greatly enhanced his business
- the victims of his embezzlement lose a significant opportunity to obtain their money back
- the state loses a significant amount of money to incarcerate him