We've all heard the case made for global warming: the average temperature over the past 100+ years has had an upward trend of 0.6°C.
In actuality, when you look at the data you see a starting point at a relatively low temperature [and starting points are important for trends]. Then you see a few decades going up, then down, then up, then down, then up... and, most recently, down. There may be a trend in there, but the jury is out about how temperatures have been taken during all of that time. Is it one long trend or a cyclical occurrence of short-term trends?
Just how long do we have to look at temperatures until we see "climate change?" I guess that's dependent upon how you define climate change. Geologically, swings of 5-10°C probably qualify as significant climate changes. In our human experience, we like to narrow that somewhat... maybe 3-5°C... because that's something that affects our comfort levels... but not necessarily our existence.
Then, if you get an 0.6°C change over a century... starting from a cold point... does that mean anything?Did we just get climate change in May? The temperatures were supposed to go up and they went down!
You'll have to excuse me now, I have to go play with my models... data models!..
