Excessive Spending - 6.32

6.32

That's the CPI inflation factor compared with 1965.

Are we truly better off today as a nation than we were in 1965? Remember, back then we were just getting involved in the Vietnam conflict. We had the Cold War with the Soviet Union. We had a space race going on. And we were a net exporter of manufactured products.

• The minimum wage was $1.25; today it is $5.15........... increased 4.12 times
  
  
  
• Community college cost $9.00 per tuition hour (1966); in 2003 it was $60.00 ........... increased 6.66 times
• University tuition was $440 per semester (1972); today it is $4,440........... increased 10 times
• A 3-bedroom ranch home cost $25,000 in 1965; today it is $250,000 ........... increased 10 times
• My wife bought a new, full-sized Ford Galaxie 500 with all options for $3,000 in 1965; today a comparable full-sized Ford costs $28,000........ increased 9.3 times
• National health care costs were $73 billion in 1970; in 2003 it was $1,679 billion........ an increase of 23 times
  

Now, I'll admit that the quality of some things has increased... but at a significant cost. What hasn't necessarily increased is the ability to afford the comparable things.

Wealth has increased... apparent wealth. Inflation adjusted debt has increased from about $35,000 per person in 1965 to $140,000 today ......... 4 times in real terms.

So let's boil it down to the essence:

• Starting wages are not keeping up with general inflation... if you are poor, you are likely to be poorer than your 1965 counterpart
• The cost of education is outstripping our ability to pay for it... but our strategy is to increase our national wealth by having an "intellectual industry"
• The cost of major products are increasing in real terms
• Health care is too costly for the working poor
• Our national debt seems to be our growth product for the future

What does that mean?

• Families must have two wage earners to survive; the one-income household is an anachronism
• Economic stratification will intensify; fewer well-paying blue-collar jobs will be available and the opportunity to move to the "intellectual industry" will be reduced
• The illusion of national prosperity will be harder to sustain; as pensions plans disappear over time, the economic boost from the retired sector will diminish overall consumer spending... retirement savings will not be enough for many given the level of debt most families have
  

Letting Go - Moving On

Family Thanksgivings are wonderful and a little sad, too.

Each Thanksgiving holiday reminds us that we can't hold on to our loved ones forever. Each Thanksgiving pulls us just a little farther apart.

Oh, the love remains, but the reality of our lives is that we gradually lose the experiences and goals in common. New jobs, new homes, new families, new interests, new needs, new wants... demand that the older generation let go so that newer generation can move on.

It's life... and it is fair... and it is necessary.

This Thanksgiving made me even more thankful for my children who have become wonderful men with a wonderful passion for life and the courage to go after what they want. They no longer really need their parents, but they still care for us and do their best to share the important parts of their lives with us. They have moved on... and we have had to let go... reluctantly.

It seems like a sad thing... but it's not.

Giving Thanks

Happy Thanksgiving

Excessive Spending - Outsourcing Doesn't Hurt (?!) - 3rd Chapter

I recommend you go to Cafe Hayek to see some interesting commentary on this subject.

Obviously, there is a significant difference in PERCEPTION about how not only OUTSOURCING OF JOBS, but the whole PROCESS OF TRADE has been affecting our nation.

I'm certain that many of those who disagree with me see me as a trade obstructionist... a protectionist, if you will... that wants to ruin the trade built up with other countries in order to protect inefficient and mismanaged domestic industries.

Not so. I'm merely pointing out certain of my PERCEPTIONS that are not necessarily shared by some others, to wit:

• certain countries are now or have provided their own industries significant "insulation" from foreign competitors enabling those industries to grow and strenthen... and then reduce their cost of production by expanding unit volume to capacity and selling the excess at cost in the U.S. to 1) gain a foothold in the U.S. market and 2) competitively undermine domestic manufacturers
• certain countries have used currency manipulation to ensure that their industries have a competitive edge in the U.S.
• certain countries do not come close to the U.S. standards protecting workers and the environment, thereby avoiding those direct costs for their industries which must be borne by U.S. manufacturers

Perhaps the strangest response to my position was by "Micha" who stated:

I have a bit of an ethical and moral problem with arguing that two wrongs make a right. The correct response to foreign countries that put up trade barriers is...to reduce our trade barriers as much as possible and continue to trade with them. It is sheer insanity to shoot ourselves in the foot merely to "get back" at the other guy for making their own country poorer through trade barriers.

1) These countries are not "making their own country poorer" through their actions... they are systematically undermining U.S. industrial capabilities

2) Trade barriers take many forms from inspection of individual vehicles verses certification of an entire model (a practice used by Japan to make importation of U.S. vehicles virtually impossible), to tariffs, to currency manipulation, to worker and environmental abuse. If such practices so hurt China, how is it that they have been so successful at creating wealth?

Other responses have been that we can replace our manufacturing with an intellectual industry. That's highly suspect, in my opinion. There is a symbiotic relationship between academia and industry... whether or not certain "intellectuals" wish to admit it or not. Without a domestic automobile industry, for example, thousands of engineers and physicists would be competing for hundreds of jobs. Without those jobs, universities would find much less demand for their "services". Oh, "something else will take their place". Why? If we are willing to let our manufacturing fall prey to predatory practices by other countries, what is to say that our universities will compete much better in the future when foreign universities can partner with their industries for new research and development... sharing both the costs and benefits.

It is my PERCEPTION that the so-called "free traders" have not thoroughly thought through the consequences of their positions. Cheap imports will be paid, ultimately, by a sharply stratified U.S. society of fewer "haves" and more "have nots".

Excessive Spending - Outsourcing Doesn't Hurt (?!) - 2nd Chapter

Rather than posting comments to comments, there are a few additional points I'd like to make regard today's earlier post.

There seems to be a tendency to view our economy as just a dynamic, free-wheeling, competitive marketplace where the weak competitors will be displaced by the strong. Well, yes... and no.

The marketplace doesn't exist in a vacuum. Certainly, there are always companies arising while others are disappearing. There are always new products replacing old products. Efficiency is rewarded; complacency is punished. This is a free market, after all.

Okay, and then there is the real world of currency manipulation, protected markets, government subsidized competition, child/slave labor, and a host of other "un-American" practices that directly impact U.S. manufacturing companies.

If you think Toyota became a powerhouse in the U.S. because they were a better company than U.S. competitors, then you don't understand how they sold their products here at cost (and avoided significant U.S. taxes) while enjoying a protected home market. You don't understand how China has grown its "competitive" manufacturing base by copying - outright pirating - U.S. intellectual property and then using that pirated capability to undermine U.S. competitors.

So, there is not a lot of sympathy for evil old General Motors now that it has fallen on hard time. Those "service economy" states sneer at the "wasteful" U.S. heavy industries. Okay, how about:

• textile quotas and restrictions protecting southern states
• sugar quotas and restrictions protecting Florida
• lumber quotas and restrictions protecting western states
• beef quotas and restrictions protecting central states
• corn subsidies for the plains states to produce ethanol
  

Hey, any wine producers fighting internet sales and imported brands? Is wine producing an industry or a service??? Oh, agriculture is different... we can't be dependent on foreign countries for our food and grown raw materials. Why not, Brazil and Canada are more cost "efficient".

Oh, come on. What would U.S. universities say if the government suddenly awarded research or service grants to foreign universities on the basis of competitive cost bidding? Plenty of good Indian PhDs out there who can work at half the price. And how "cost efficient" are U.S. universities... those bastions of our intellectual wealth... when they require double-digit percentage tuition increases for decades? Oh, yeah, we can't import those services.

Right, so a geographic oligopoly gives our intellectual industry the right to lord it over our manufacturing sector.

This isn't a "free market". It is many different kinds of markets that play by many different kind of rules. And rules can be changed. It is part of "economic policy"... or lack of one.

Excessive Spending - Outsourcing Doesn't Hurt (?!)

In the blog "Cafe Hayek", Don Boudreaux writes:

Among the many histrionics of election year 2004 was the concern that free trade in general, and "outsourcing" in particular, would soon rid America of high-paying jobs.

But now comes this report, entitled "Firms' New Grail: Skilled Workers," in today's Wall Street Journal (paid subscription required). Here are the opening lines:

Difficulty in finding enough skilled workers is hampering the ability of many U.S. manufacturers to serve their customers.

My response was the following:

I'm sorry. What country was that again?

As reported in the Detroit Free Press:

"The Motor City is facing a fearful holiday season after three of the auto industry's biggest companies announced nearly 60,000 job cuts in the past week, with more to follow."
http://www.freepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051122/BUSINESS01/511220317/1002/BUSINESS

There are plenty of highly skilled people being fired (let's not use euphemisms). Okay, blame it on poor management, high labor costs, etc. But the reality is that outsourcing has had a real and significant impact on this midwestern area.

The federal government declared Louisiana a disaster area with its hurricane damage and is pouring billions into it to restore and repair. What is happening to Michigan is far more insidious, but just as real.

Just wait until it hits home elsewhere and see how sanguine the rest of the country is.

The billions of dollars that the "baby boomers" retiring from Michigan spend in places like Florida may be at risk as companies like Delphi and General Motors collapse. Remember, "service jobs" are at the end of the money trail. A few new robotics plants or medical research facilities do not equate to the loss of U.S. owned manufacturing jobs and profits that get recirculated in the U.S. economy.

Ask yourself if our goal as a country is to restructure ourselves to be a source of low cost labor so that we can be "competitive." If not, ask yourselves what those reasonably-paid skilled people will be doing... they won't all be medical researchers or mechanical engineers.

John R. Saul is the author of The Collapse of Globalism

"At the heart of The Collapse of Globalism is a question that's fundamental to economics but often not asked explicitly: Are political decisions meant to be made in deference to the economy and markets, or can we use our political institutions to shield us from some of the harsher effects that markets can dish out?

The argument is that "globalization" isn't a homogeneous process, but is economic interaction that can be... and is... affected by political policies.

In short, in what's meant to be a "world without borders," it's been impossible for people to ignore just how much local economic conditions really matter. In response, some participants in the global economy have begun to realize and exercise some of their local power."

Chicken Little? Think again.

The problem is that "outsourcing" is more than replacing a few people with a few jobs overseas. It is "outsourcing" of supplies and even whole products that are imported and sold as "U.S." brand products by companies like GM and Delphi. Who needs Chevy when we can import "Chery"? Sure, we can gut our manufacturing capability and become a "nation of consumers."

For how long???

Excessive Spending - Market Pricing or Greed

Dr. Don Boudreaux who writes in the blog "Cafe Hayek" noted today:

Yesterday, at a gasoline station that I frequently use, I noticed that the price of a gallon of 87-octane gasoline is down 36 percent to $2.17 -- down from $3.39 about six or seven weeks ago.

I guess this fact means that oil-company executives are 36 percent less greedy today than they were in mid-September.

I commented that:

The oil companies were certainly the beneficiaries of a market distorted by speculation about possible oil and gasoline shortages. The subsequent price adjustment to the "compared to what" level reflects what a less speculative marketplace values those commodities. [Another writer had asked "When people complain that "gouging-level" prices are too high, I always want to ask, "compared to what?". What is it that made the original prices okay?"]

The marketplace works... most of the time. It's only when speculators grasp control for awhile that oil and tulips reach untenable positions... and when the "Joe" on the street pays the price for their greed.

Some other people decided it was best to get into a philosophical discussion regarding the differences between "greed" and "market pricing." That's all well and good except the marketplace is not perfect or immune to manipulation or speculation (another term for "greed" to which many "traders" and "investors" succumb). The marketplace does, however, correct those abuses rather dramatically.

Excessive Spending - Recession or Remixing?

On October 13 I wrote:

I'm going out on a limb now, but I think the 4th Quarter of 2005 will be viewed, retrospectively, as the beginning of a new recession in the U.S.

Since then, the stock market has done pretty well with the S&P going from around its yearly low to near its yearly high. Does that mean no recession?

Well, let's not confuse the stock market with economic activity. Especially in Michigan.

• Ford to cut 4,000 white collar jobs in North America by early next year
• Forecast: Manufacturing slump to hold down Michigan's economy
• Michigan job losses to go on, U-M says... despite recent declines in Michigan's unemployment rate, they forecast the jobless rate in the state to begin rising again soon, peaking at 7.6% by late 2007.

Add to that the woes at Delphi and Northwest Airlines and Delta Airlines and I just don't see "booming economy" anywhere.

Maybe it's in Florida?

Florida job market is enviable
In the Orlando area, unemployment rate hits 5-year low

Doing what?

In certain sectors such as information technology, human resources and engineering, employers are bidding for the services of skilled workers

Must be the warm weather....

Big Day

The food is ready, the drinks are chilling, more chairs have been gathered near the big screen.

Yes, a big day today! This is our last chance to see our friends before they return to Florida for the winter.

Oh, yeah. Michigan and Ohio State are playing some kind of game, too, I think.

For Sale: Everything

Sometimes things just don't make sense. Looks like the "beta" version needs a little fine tuning. 

Excessive Litigation - When Lawyers Sue Lawyers

Most lawyers I've met personally have been pretty decent sorts. Family guys, football fans, hard working, even generous with their time.

But sometimes the headline-grabbers mix it up in public. To wit, State Attorney General Mike Cox has threatened to prosecute (not sue, really) the notorious Geoffrey Fieger because Mr. Fieger is alleged to have created a "Citizens for Judicial Reform and that a Herb Charbonneau was the treasurer" when actually there was only one citizen involved, Mr. Fieger, and that Mr. Charbonneau may not have actually existed.

Mr. Fieger has now hired yet another attorney to represent him, Mr. Richard L. Steinberg, who stated:

Only last month, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the First Amendment protected the anonymity of a blogger who launched a vitriolic, even defamatory, attack on the integrity and sanity of a small-town public official.

So, if Geoff Fieger decided to reach into his own pocket and spend his own money to make his own views known to Michigan's voting public, so what? It's his money. So what, if there is not, and never was, a Citizens for Judicial Reform or a Herb Charbonneau. Where's the crime?

Well, maybe no crime was committed there.

Curiously, however, Mr. Cox has also accused Mr. Fieger of threatening to blackmail him concerning some sexual affairs Mr. Cox had. I say "curiously" because if there really has been no crime, why bother to blackmail the prosecutor? On the other hand, Mr. Fieger has stated his intentions to run for Attorney General, so perhaps there was some interest in derailing that by showing some related nastiness on Mr. Fieger's part. On the third hand, Oakland County Prosecutor, David Gorcyca, said he didn't really have a case against Mr. Fieger. On the fourth hand, Mr. Fieger has been known to get pretty creative with the law.

The Detroit Free Press gives a pretty good accounting of the intrigue, if you are interested. For me, this is a case of Mr. Windbag vs. Mr. Bluster... leaving most of us wondering what the real meaning of "justice" is... and who is pursuing it.

Ethnic Divisiveness - Liberty, Equality, Fraternity - Verse 2

USNews.com has a different take about the riots in France than I wrote:

A striking characteristic of the demonstrators is their youth, with many of those involved only 13 or 14 years old. In part this is because French law cannot punish them until they reach 16. Many observers worry, however, that the age of the rioters has shown that their parents have lost control or, worse, agree with the tactics.

One thing the great majority of observers agree about is that the disturbances are not controlled by Islamic extremists or inspired by religious sentiment. The young people rioting have a sense of religion "approaching zero," says Dounia Bouzar, a former member of the Superior Council of French Muslims. "In general, these kids dream only of getting money and consuming like everybody else."

For Bouzar, French politicians have for 20 years refused to deal with the origins of inequality in French society. Riots in 1982 included a march by immigrants from Lyon to Paris that received massive media coverage.

"After the 1982 riots, the young promoters of the March for Equality denounced discrimination in housing and jobs," Bouzar said. "But the idea was insidiously planted in the mind of the public that the causes were not social but cultural . . . if young people burned automobiles it was not because of discrimination but because their parents came from a different culture."

Bouzar says nothing has changed but that today French leaders try to relate the violence to religion, providing an excuse for dealing with the political, social, and economic reasons behind the violence.

However, the story did suggest that the French government may not be entirely to blame:

Employment does indeed seem to be one of the keys to the problem, along with endemic —if frequently silent —discrimination. Unemployment among immigrants of North African origin ages 15 to 24, for example, is about 37 percent compared with 20 percent for the French as a whole and 12.7 percent for foreigners from other EU countries. Even in the 751 so-called sensitive urban zones designated by the government for special attention, unemployment is 19.6 percent and as high as 30 percent among the 21-to-29 age group, according to official government statistics.

Immigrant youths living in underprivileged areas complain that no matter how many CVs (resumes) they send out, the answer is almost always the same- –silence. An experiment by the independent "Discrimination Observatory" found that applications with the same resume received half as many invitations for interviews when the address signaled a disadvantaged area.

Nevertheless, it is easy to forget in the current context the tremendous efforts made by the French government over the past two decades to improve conditions for immigrants.

"The poor French suburbs are relatively spoiled compared with American inner cities," says Stanger. "They have medical care, schools, and gymnasiums that any affluent American community would be proud of."

On October 16, 2004, I wrote:

Recounting previous points:

• we have an instinct to survive, acquire, and pass on our DNA
• we survive best in "herds"
• herds are structured to satisfy the strong and accomodate the weak
• the rules of one herd may vary from others based on experience and environment

To this list, let's add

• herds will not readily accept "outsiders"

Why, because outsiders alter the dynamics of the herd and may not play by the rules of the herd. Therefore, they are seen as a threat to the survival of the herd.

The "native herd" accepts a few different individuals as "curiousities" until there are enough of these individuals to be discerned as a "new herd". Then conflict commences.

Addendum from The National Review

Ironically the politician being denounced for inflaming the French rioters, interior minister Nicolas Sarkozy, has some of the best ideas about how Europe could better integrate its Muslim citizens. Sarkozy argues that affirmative action is needed for Muslims, heresy in egalitarian France. He also proposes that the state fund mosques. This is imperative: Otherwise large numbers of mosques will continue to preach the divisive, extremist doctrine of Wahabism. There is no reason that Muslim populations hailing from moderate societies should be led by Wahabi imams.

Of course, these steps towards integration cannot come only from one side. Muslim leaders will have to play a constructive role rather than acting as grievance mongers. For instance, as the Prospect's editor David Goodhart points out, the supposedly mainstream Muslim Council of Britain could stop referring to the war in Afghanistan as a "misguided" effort that sparked an "increase in prejudice" against Muslims.

We can be fairly confident that the Paris riots will not convince immigrants in other countries to begin a European intifada. They should, however, convince European leaders to stop casting around their own continent for an effective model of integration. That model, unfortunately, doesn't yet exist. Sarkozy and Europe's other visionaries are going to have to create it on their own.

...seems like damned if you do and damned if you don't.... I still like "melting pot" versus "diversity".

Ethnic Divisiveness - Myth of Muslim Solidarity - Verse 2

Back on September 18, I wrote regarding :

The IRA (Iraqi Republican Army aka al-Qaeda aka Charles Manson & Associates) have officially "declared war" on Shi'ite Muslims.

That reminds me a lot of the "other IRA" that has had an ongoing war against certain Protestant Christians.

It's A L L__A B O U T__P O W E R; it's not about religion. Repeat that 72 times.

Now listen carefully so that you can hear the voices of protest amongst the Muslims worldwide to this anti-Islamic display. You have to listen very carefully. Very, very carefully. Shhhh....

Since then, that same Iraqi contingent of al-Quiche has blown apart their "fellow Muslims" in Jordan. Now, as the Detroit Free Press reports, there are voices of protest:

After the bombings, claimed by al-Zarqawi's Al Qaeda in Iraq, thousands of Jordanians took to the streets throughout the kingdom, shouting: "Burn in hell, al-Zarqawi."

Because of the extremist attacks, "All Jordanians -- even fanatic Muslims -- are changing their minds because of what they saw happen to innocent people" in Amman, said Ibrahim Hreish, a jeweler in the Jordanian capital.

"There has been empathy among Jordanians for insurgent strikes against military targets in Iraq, particularly against U.S. forces," said Mustafa Hamarneh, a researcher on domestic attitudes toward suicide bombings....

"I believe we will now begin to see a change in how the country's press reports events in Iraq, such as suicide bombings, and in public attitudes," he said

Well, duh! We meant it was okay for you to bomb them, not us.

I.Q. Relates To Longevity

SOURCE: American Journal of Epidemiology, November 2005.

And in general, (Dr. Laurie T.) Martin noted, IQ scores reflect a "set of skills," like reasoning, planning and communication, that affect how people manage their health -- from talking with their doctors to dealing with a complex healthcare system.

Understanding exactly why IQ affects longevity, according to Martin, could ultimately help improve health and healthcare for everyone.

Okay, smarter people tend (not a rule) to get better jobs, have more resources, manage their circumstances better, and make better decisions which reduce the chances for accidental, violent, or neglect-related deaths.

Now there is no need for a further study.

Ethnic Divisiveness - Liberty, Equality, Fraternity

The French have had a shaky time of things. The idea of "liberty, equality, fraternity" has never quite caught on despite best intentions. Now events in France are testing that notion fully.

There is a new phenomenon ... well, not new, but more recognized... that immigration is different than it used to be. Immigration, acclimation, assimilation is now immigration, isolation, confrontation. It is a defacto invasion rather than immigration.

That is not to say that all immigrants are trying to undermine the community of their new home. Rather it is a clash of ideologies. The expectations of the new Middle Eastern and African residents is that they are simply moving locations rather than starting a new life. There is no real interest in becoming part of the culture of the new location... they are bringing their own culture and plan to keep it intact despite significant differences with that of the new host country.

We cannot bring up our kids the way we want, to teach them Islam," said Sabrine, adding that France encourages children to choose how they want to practice religion.

"They say religion is not obligatory or that parents are not allowed to make their children wear the hijab (veil) or to pray," she said. "They want to give our children the same freedoms they give to the French." (oh, oh!)

Then there is this "confusion" about why there is a sense of isolation and rejection by the citizens of the host country. Hmmmm.

Veteran's Day

Veterans Day, 2005

November 2, 2005

A Proclamation by the President of the United States of America

Americans owe a great debt of gratitude to those who have sacrificed for our liberty and for the security of our Nation. We express deep appreciation to our veterans -- the men and women who stepped forward when America needed them, triumphed over brutal enemies, liberated continents, and answered the prayers of millions around the globe.

From the beaches of Normandy and the snows of Korea to the mountains of Afghanistan and the deserts of Iraq, our courageous veterans have sacrificed so that Americans and others could live in freedom. As we mark the 60th anniversary of the end of World War II this year, we remember the millions of veterans who crossed oceans and defeated two of the most ruthless military forces the world has ever known. The freedom that the children and grandchildren of these veterans now enjoy is a monument to their fallen comrades and the generations of patriots who have served our country.

Through their commitment to freedom, America 's veterans have lifted millions of lives and made our country and the world more secure. They have demonstrated to us that freedom is the mightiest force on Earth. We resolve that their sacrifices will always be remembered by a grateful Nation.

With respect for and in recognition of the contributions our service men and women have made to the cause of peace and freedom around the world, the Congress has provided (5 U.S.C. 6103(a)) that November 11 of each year shall be set aside as a legal public holiday to honor veterans.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim November 11, 2005, as Veterans Day and urge all Americans to observe November 6 through November 12, 2005, as National Veterans Awareness Week. I urge all Americans to recognize the valor and sacrifice of our veterans through ceremonies and prayers. I call upon Federal, State, and local officials to display the flag of the United States and to encourage and participate in patriotic activities in their communities. I invite civic and fraternal organizations, places of worship, schools, businesses, unions, and the media to support this national observance with commemorative expressions and programs.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this second day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

GEORGE W. BUSH

Ethnic Divisiveness - Shades of Black

From Desiree Cooper of the Detroit Free Press:

Rule No. 1 for campaigning in Detroit: Not all blacks are black. In order to win here, you've got to resonate with those citizens of what Michigan State University sociologist Carl Taylor calls the "Third City," an urban sub-culture born of poverty and neglect. Taylor is the author of several books about urban culture including "Dangerous Society."

"In the Third City, you have citizens, noncitizens -- people who participate in an underground economy, but not in mainstream civic life -- and anticitizens -- people who defy authority and accept criminal activity as normative," said Taylor. "There's a strong identity of 'us' against 'them' -- the white power structure and the black bourgeoisie."

My response to Ms. Cooper and the Detroit Free Press:

Desiree Cooper's article (Kilpatrick's win was not really a surprise) resonated strongly with me.

My three closest neighbors are an automotive plant supervisor, an industrial engineer and an engineer who owns his own consulting firm. They maintain their property well and are all out-going, friendly and helpful. Their children are well-behaved and get along well. They appreciate a good place to live. Two just happen to have much darker skin than the third. But in Detroit, those two would not qualify as "black" according to Ms. Cooper's article.

Ms. Cooper's article is perpetuating a myth of what being "black" is. You know... style over substance, slang versus educated speech, posing versus profundity... diamond ear studs, Lincoln Navigators and wild parties at taxpayer expense. Sadly, rather than aspiring to better themselves and their city, a majority of Detroit's voters chose to be "represented." It is that thinking that has emptied much of Detroit of it's intellectual and financial resources. When the people who qualify as citizens of a "Third City" are the role models for the future, then the future is a "third-class city."

Detroit - Be Careful What You Wish For

It's hard to fathom that the most maligned mayor in the U.S., Kwame Kilpatrick, would be re-elected by the citizens of Detroit. Yet, somehow, the citizens of Detroit decided that Mr. Kilpatrick would be a better choice than Freman Hendrix, the challenger.

Well, it seems that everyone deserves a second chance... or third ... or fourth ... or fifth ....

Meanwhile, Poll finds 33% of Detroiters want to leave

November 9, 2005

BY PATRICIA MONTEMURRI
FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

About one out of three Detroit voters surveyed Tuesday said they would move out of Detroit if they could.

The big question seems to be: what is Mr. Kilpatrick's appeal to the 67% of Detroit's citizens who want to stay? After all, he did take his ear stud out and Jackie Currie, his free-wheeling City Clerk, is gone.

Maybe they just decided that Freeman Hendrix wasn't ----- enough.

Environmental Extremism - Nothing Finer

• Michigan
• November
• 70 degrees
• Clear skies
• Spectacular color

Does not compute!

Tonight, my wife, brother, son and friend sat with me around a large campfire in the middle of the Michigan "thumb" where the only lights were from the occasional farmhouse. Crisp, cool, cozy. Very nice.

Ethnic Divisiveness - Out Of Sight

Looking back over the natural disasters that affected the world, everything pales in comparison with the earthquake that hit Pakistan. Sure, hurricanes were big news in the U.S. and caused a lot of property damage. But for deadliness, nothing has come close to the earthquake in Pakistan.

And yet...

• ...the World Food Program has only received $9.8 million of the $100 million it needs to run the Pakistani air operation, the UN said.
• Less than a quarter of the $550 million needed for aid agency emergency programs has been pledged by donor nations....
• The death toll in Pakistan rose to 73,276, General Farooq Ahmed, the chairman of Pakistan's Federal Relief Commission, said yesterday in Islamabad.

Why do you suppose that a disaster of this magnitude has been largely ignored by the rest of the world. Some possible reasons:

• Remoteness - few foreigners have reason to go there and few if any have been affected directly. When the Tsunami raced over the Indian Ocean, there were Americans and Europeans in the area. News travels fast when friends and family are affected.
• Politics - " The Himalayan territory of Kashmir has been the cause of armed conflict between India and Pakistan since their independence in 1947. More than two dozen groups are fighting against Indian rule in Jammu and Kashmir, India's only Muslim-majority state. A 16-year insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir has killed at least 50,000 people."
• Antipathy toward Muslims - like it or not, the world is not exactly enamored with Muslims these days and many "kuffar" do not care if the "true believers" die... some may think it is perfect "justice"

But one only need look into the faces of the children to know that all of those "reasons" mean nothing.

Ethnic Divisiveness - Iranian Nazis

Heil, Ahmadinejad!

Who? What? Huh?

Iran Leader Calls for Israel's Destruction

Okay, so what else is new?

THE IRANIAN PRESIDENT'S AWFUL, VALUABLE COMMENTS.
Useful Idiot
by James Forsyth

A joint statement by the E.U. leaders noted that "Calls for violence, and for the destruction of any state, are manifestly inconsistent with any claim to be a mature and responsible member of the international community." Blair then personally went further: "To anyone in Europe, knowing our history, when we hear statements like that made about Israel it makes us feels very angry, it's just completely wrong. ... Ask yourself: A state like that, with an attitude like that, having a nuclear weapon?"

And how did Iran respond?

Iranian leader rebuts critics over Israel remarks
Thousands of Iranians stage anti-Israel demonstrations

Friday, October 28, 2005; Posted: 4:26 p.m. EDT (20:26 GMT)

Iranians at anti-Israel rally in Tehran

(CNN) -- Thousands of Iranians staged anti-Israel protests across the country Friday and repeated calls by their ultraconservative president demanding the Jewish state's destruction.

Also...

Iran Purges 40 Ambassadors in Shake-Up

By ALI AKBAR DAREINI, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 15 minutes ago

TEHRAN, Iran -
Iran's hard-line government said Wednesday it was removing 40 ambassadors and senior diplomats, including supporters of warmer ties with the West, from their posts in a shake-up that comes as the Islamic republic takes a more confrontational international stance.

Remember when Rodney King asked why can't we all just get along? Because....

Where Were All Of The Children?

Halloween... trick or treat... ghost and goblins... empty street.

The weather was perfect... calm... 60. The porch lights were on. The bowls of candy ready. The children were absent.

Maybe all of the children have grown up and there are none to take there place. Neighborhoods do grow older before they get younger again. But it was quite a disappointment. Less than 2 dozen children... and at least half of them were teenagers... showed up to beg for their once-a-year treats.

Maybe it's our society. Too much fear. Maybe holidays have lost their appeal. Too commercial. Whatever the reason, the children were absent.

Not much of a Halloween.