READ ABOUT DETROIT AND SOLUTIONS TO ITS PROBLEMS. CLICK HERE.
Showing posts with label Taxes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Taxes. Show all posts

Sunday, January 27, 2013

The Egyptian Mafia

SEARCH BLOG: CRIME and ISLAM.

Most adults have at least heard about organized crime... often referred to as the Mafia.  It used to be just about Italians, but now it encompasses just about any ethnic group of criminals... Irish, Russian, etc.

This short video is part of a documentary about the Italian Mafia.


Now there is an Egyptian Mafia.  That's not what they call themselves, of course.  They go by the name of the "Brigade of Muslims."  Here's an excerpt.
An armed Islamic movement calling itself the "Brigade of Muslims" released a statement on Saturday threatening Egypt's Coptic Christians and asking them to pay tribute.  [ jizya, also spelled jizyah, Arabic jizyah ,  head or poll tax that early Islamic rulers demanded from their non-Muslim subjects.]
"Egypt is an Islamic country and will be ruled according to Shariah," the statement added. [source]

Meanwhile, the U.S. sends military equipment to Egypt and other Islamic countries to defend themselves against ???  Perhaps those Copts?
..

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Federal Government Still Absolutely Not Serious About Addressing The Debt

SEARCH BLOG: TAXES and SPENDING.

This was after the so-called Fiscal Cliff deadline.

THURSDAY, JANUARY 03, 2013


Federal Government Absolutely Not Serious About Addressing Debt

We can say with reasonable assurance that nothing has changed.

House votes to defuse debt limit crisis
House votes overwhelmingly to defuse debt crisis, decides to increase borrowing limit
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The House overwhelmingly passed a bill Wednesday to permit the government to borrow enough money to avoid a first-time default for at least four months, defusing a looming crisis setting up a springtime debate over taxes, spending and the deficit.

..

Monday, January 21, 2013

Obama: If We Can Just Raise The Tax Rates On the Wealthy, Everything Will Work Out

SEARCH BLOG: OBAMA and TAXES.

Barack wants to be just like François.  And just like France, the U.S. may see these results.

Golfer Phil Mickelson May Call It Quits Due To Climbing Tax Rates
Obama-tide... lowering the level of all ships.

Comment from the article:
Phil is hardly suffering, but that doesn’t necessarily justify derision for his anger about more of his income being confiscated in the name of “fairness.” There are a lot of “fairness” seekers who would never consider putting in the hours necessary to hone a talent that could earn the wealth that comes with being the best. There are a lot of “fairness” seekers who would never consider working in lieu of government largesse. There are a lot of “fairness” seekers who see the success of others as the basis of their own failures.
Perhaps there should be a special tax on those who chronically siphon off the rewards of hard work from others.
..

Wednesday, January 09, 2013

Obama To Fight Climate Change

SEARCH BLOG: OBAMA and CLIMATE CHANGE.

Despite growing evidence that the climate changes regardless of mankind's influence, President Obama may embark on a bold new effort to control the climate through taxes.  The first step will be to gather enough politicians in one place that reasoned thought is impossible.  This may happen soon.

From the Guardian:

Barack Obama may intervene directly on climate change by hosting a summit at the White House early in his second term, environmental groups say.
They say the White House has given encouraging signals to a proposal for Obama to use the broad-based and bipartisan summit to launch a national climate action strategy.
"What we talked about with the White House is using it as catalyst not just for the development of a national strategy but for mobilising people all over the country at every level," said Bob Doppelt, executive director of the Resource Innovation Group, the Oregon-based thinktank that has been pushing for the high-level meeting. He said it would not be a one-off event.
After all, 2012 was the hottest year ever.  Well, maybe not.
2012 Didn't Crack The Top Ten For Record Maximums: 'NOAA has inflated 2012 record maximum number by adding new stations which didn't exist during the hot years of 1930s'' -- 'That is a completely illegitimate approach. An apples to apples comparison uses only the same stations. When that is done, 2012 doesn't even crack the ten hottest years'
Feds caught altering past temperature data: NOAA claims 1998 was previous 'hottest on record' on record -- But in 1999, the same year was only the 5th warmest before 'adjustments' -- 'In an article which NASA published in 1999, Hansen showed that 1998 was only the fifth warmest year, after 1934, 1921, 1931 and 1953. In fact, 1998 was 0.6C cooler than 1934' -- 'Over the past decade, NASA and NOAA have continuously altered the temperature record to cool the past and warm the present. Their claims are straight out Orwell's 1984, and have nothing to do with science' 
[source] 
..

Thursday, January 03, 2013

Federal Government Absolutely Not Serious About Addressing Debt

SEARCH BLOG: TAXES and SPENDING.

Disregard everything you hear coming from President Obama, Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell, and John Boehner regarding the so-called negotiations on the so-called fiscal cliff.  It is absolutely, positively, without question, business-as-usual in Washington D.C.

Tim Carney: How corporate tax credits got in the 'cliff' deal. 

Fiscal Cliff Bill Loaded With Pork.

FISCAL CLIFF NEGOTIATIONS LEAVE HEDGE FUND TAX LOOPHOLE UNSCATHED.




So, if the fiscal cliff negotiations increase tax revenue by about $600 billion over ten years ... about $60 billion per year ... and the tax loopholes enacted reduce tax revenue by more than $70 billion per year... where's the beef?

UPDATE:

Via Reason.com:


Looks as if Harry Reid uses the Nancy Pelosi playbook:
You have to vote for it to see what's in it.
..

Saturday, December 29, 2012

Suggested New Taxes For Obama's Budget

SEARCH BLOG: TAXES.

We need new taxes.  Debt is raging and spending cannot be cut without hurting those who are most vulnerable in our society... politicians.  Literally dozens of politicians would be thrown out of their jobs if they failed to deliver the customary freebies to their special interests.  Consequently, we need to be creative in our taxing.

Obviously, we can tax the rich more.  They may simply move their wealth elsewhere, but we could catch a bump in revenue for a year or two while they make the necessary adjustments.  No, we need to go where the sources are not so mobile.


Here are a few suggestions:
  • 10% church tax.  There are so many wealthy churches out there.  They have hardwood pews and expensive stained glass windows.  Money up the kazoo.  They won't miss some of that cash that's just lying around. [image]
  • 20% charity tax.  These charities raise millions of dollars each year, maybe billions.  They are supposed to help the poor or sick, but that's the job of our government, not private individuals or groups.  Besides, they have huge administrative costs unlike the government which returns $2 for every $1 collected.  Charities are so 18th century.
  • 30% meat tax.  Vegetarians don't need meat so why should anyone else?  It's a luxury and should be treated as such.  Think of all of those hamburgers and chicken sold at fast food places.  Luxury, that's all it is.  There are plenty of soybeans available. [image]
  • 40% new car tax.  What's the matter with an older car?  There are millions of older cars... and second cars around.  New cars require energy to produce and that produces CO2 which will kill everyone in 20 years if we don't have sequestration.  Walking is healthier.
  • 50% electronics tax.  People buy new cell phones and TVs much too often.  Besides, all of those electronics are cluttering the airwaves and making birds ill.  Someone has to save the birds and that will cost money... lots of money.  The government will do it, but it's time to stop the offenders. [image]
  • 60% health care tax.  Oh, wait.  That's being handled already.
  • 70% energy tax.  People in Africa and India get by without all of that expensive heating and air-conditioning.  It's healthier to have fresh air in the house and it will be fresher without all of that energy pollution.
  • 80% education tax.  Only applies to those who live within 100 miles of a school and based on average expenditures per pupil.  Private schools will have a 20% surcharge on this tax. Exemption forms will be available in person at the IRS offices in Washington, D.C.  Please have 4 sources of picture identification and your original birth certificate which will not be returned.  Members of Congress, the Executive Branch [department heads and above], and those illegally in the U.S. are exempt from filing exemption forms. [image]
  • 90% birth tax.  New children are taking up valuable space and resources better used by Canada geese and coyotes.  Tax based on average cost to raise a child to age 25 when they can become wards of the government.
  • 100% death tax.  You don't need it anymore and your government does.  Trust us. [image]

Fiscal Cliff And Higher Taxes - Follow The Money

SEARCH BLOG: TAXES.

The Democratic Party has failed to develop a budget for the past four years.  By simply ignoring good fiscal management, the Democratic Party has plunged the U.S. deeply into debt and now wants to shift the blame for this mismanagement onto the Republican Party because the Republican-controlled House of Representatives does not want to allow the mismanagement to continue... masked by higher taxes.

President Obama has tried to maintain his distance from the debate over how to resolve his party's fiscal mismanagement, but now is attempting to create the impression that he is taking a "leadership" position in his attempt to create the impression that the Republicans will not compromise so that there can be a "bi-partisan" solution.  The reality is that President Obama wants to legislate increase taxes but only offer a vague promise to bring spending under control... not actually reduce spending.

What is the result of that approach?  Just look at France.


Yes, follow the tax money... right out of the country.  The wealthy have options.  When push comes to shove, they will walk away with their money and tax revenues will fall.

RELATED:


..

Thursday, December 27, 2012

Blame It On Bush Once Again

SEARCH BLOG: TAXES.

President Obama wants the people of the United States to believe that he only wants to raise taxes on the rich.  After all, the Bush tax cuts only helped the rich, right?  The Democrats didn't want the tax cuts in the first place and only agreed to go along on the condition that that could last only ten years.

In 2001, when Bush proposed the tax cuts, Democrats argued they would benefit the wealthy, create long-term deficits and deprive social programs of needed money. Some Democrats at the time were open to a more modest tax cut, especially one less favorable to the rich. Bush could push his tax cuts through Congress only by agreeing they would expire a decade later. [source]
Now, President Obama has had second thoughts.  Those terrible Bush tax cuts that cut into social programs for the benefit of the rich are all right as long as the rich are excluded.  That way they can pay their "fair share."

But what really happened with the Bush tax cuts?
According to official IRS data, the top 1% of income earners paid $84 billion more in federal income taxes in 2007 than in 2000 before the Bush tax cuts were passed, 23% more.  The share of total federal income taxes paid by the top 1% rose from 37% in 2000, before the Bush tax cuts, to 40% in 2007, after the tax cuts. 
In contrast, the bottom half of income earners paid $6 billion less in federal income taxes in 2007 than in 2000, a decline of 16%.  The share of federal income taxes paid by the bottom 50% declined from 3.9% in 2000 to 2.9% in 2007. 
The Bush tax cuts also included a doubling of the child tax credit from $500 per child to $1,000 per child.  Because of that, and the 33% cut in the bottom tax rate, nearly 8 million more people dropped off the federal income tax rolls entirely, paying zero federal income taxes.  Indeed, under the Bush tax cuts, the bottom 40% of all income earners not only paid no federal income taxes, as a group on net.  By 2009, they were being paid cash by the IRS equal to 10% of all federal income taxes. 
These Bush tax cuts did not explode the deficit, as Obama and his echo chamber have alleged.  By 2007, the deficit was down to $160 billion, less than 15% of Obama’s deficits today.  Total federal revenues soared from $793.7 billion in 2003, when the last of the Bush tax cuts were enacted, to $1.16 trillion in 2007, a 47% increase.  Capital gains revenues had doubled by 2005, despite the 25% capital gains rate cut adopted in 2003.  Federal revenues rose to 18.5% of GDP by 2007, above the long term, postwar, historical average over the prior 60 years.  CBO was projecting surpluses to return indefinitely in 2012 through the end of its projection period in 2018. [source]
Well, the fiscal crash happened and federal revenues dried up as personal wealth dried up.  Blame it on the rich... which is exactly what the Democrats are doing.

So, what makes the Democrats believe that by reversing the Bush tax cuts for those earning over $250,000 per year revenues will increase... when revenues increased when the tax rates were cut?  Actually, President Obama doesn't believe that at all.  This is nothing more than an extension of his politics of class warfare that will do nothing to solve the excessive spending problem of the Federal government and do everything to stifle economic growth an tax revenues.
..

Wednesday, December 05, 2012

Obama: Tax Problems Are Just A Nuisance If You Are A Black Leader

SEARCH BLOG: OBAMA and TAXES.

It's bad enough that we have a Secretary of the Treasury who did not fill out his own taxes correctly.  But now President Obama is seeking tax advice from a known tax evader.

The Huffington Post reported:

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama met with Rachel Maddow, Al Sharpton and other "influential progressives" on Tuesday as part of his campaign to sell the public on the need to extend the Bush middle-class tax cuts.
White House deputy press secretary Josh Earnest confirmed the meeting took place. It wasn't listed on Obama's schedule.
"This afternoon at the White House, the President met with influential progressives to talk about the importance of preventing a tax increase on middle class families, strengthening our economy and adopting a balanced approach to deficit reduction," Earnest said in a statement Tuesday.
Perhaps President Obama does not get any briefings about the people with whom he meets on important subjects.
FREE BEACON – MSNBC’s Al Sharpton is reeling in debt and back taxes. The liberal provocateur owes nearly $1 million to creditors and the federal government as a result of his failed bid for the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination. His campaign’s unpaid bills exceed $888,000, according to federal filings.
It is unclear why Sharpton has not paid his creditors. He does not lack for income. …
Sharpton, who has endorsed President Barack Obama’s calls for taxing the rich, has his own tax issues. He owed the IRS $2.6 million in income taxes in December 2011, as well as almost $900,000 in New York state taxes. [source]
Sharpton is among several black leaders and politicians who have had problems accounting for money.  They might not be the best spokesmen for Obama's tax policies.  Or they might be indicative of exactly what Obama's tax policies are.
..

Tuesday, December 04, 2012

Liberal Businessmen Not So Liberal With Their Own Taxable Income

SEARCH BLOG: ECONOMY and TAXES.

With the prospect of higher taxes on dividends as the Bush tax cuts being replaced with Obama tax increases, wealthy liberal businessmen are acting very conservatively with regard to their own investments.

Costco's co-founder, James Sinegal, appeared at the Democratic National Convention.


From the National Review.
Last Wednesday, the Costco board of directors voted for a special dividend costing $3 billion, which will be completely financed through borrowing. The dividend is timed to take advantage of current tax rates, which will almost triple on January 1, 2013, for wealthy investors such as those on the Costco board. As The Wall Street Journal reports:
Dividends are typically paid out of earnings, either current or accumulated.… We think companies can do what they want with their cash, but it’s certainly rare to see a public corporation weaken its balance sheet not for investment in the future but to make a one-time equity payout.
As The Wall Street Journal pointed out:
One of the biggest dividend winners will be none other than Mr. Sinegal, who owns about two million shares, while his wife owns another 84,669. At $7 a share, the former CEO will take home roughly $14 million. At a 15% tax rate he'll get to keep nearly $12 million of that windfall, while at next year's rate of 43.4% he'd take home only about $8 million. That's a lot of extra cannoli.
Well, he is certainly taking the uncertainty out of his financial equation.

..

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

New Taxes Coming: Be Prepared To Open Your Wallets

SEARCH BLOG: TAXES

It's unlikely to be a Happy New Year for most Americans.  Why?

  • Personal income tax rates will rise on January 1, 2013.
  • Higher taxes on marriage and family coming on January 1, 2013.
  • Middle Class Death Tax returns on January 1, 2013.
  • Higher tax rates on savers and investors on January 1, 2013. 
  • The Obamacare Medical Device Tax begins to be assessed on January 1, 2013.
  • The Obamacare “Haircut” for Medical Itemized Deductions goes into force on January 1, 2013. 
  • The AMT will ensnare over 31 million families, up from 4 million last year.
  • Full business expensing will disappear.
  • Taxes will be raised on all types of businesses.
  • Tax Benefits for Education and Teaching Reduced.
  • Charitable Contributions from IRAs no longer allowed.
h/t Bill via email.  Full story here.

Hey, we all have tax problems.  Get over it.
With hope and small change,
Barack 

2012 IS HERE

..

Saturday, September 08, 2012

When Illegal Immigrants Speak At A National Political Convention, Tax Cheats Will Become Secretary Of The Treasury

SEARCH BLOG: IMMIGRATION and TAXES.


Oh wait... that has already happened.


Careless... avoidable... but that still qualifies him for Secretary of the Treasury in the Obama administration.

RELATED:

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 22, 2012


2012 IS HERE

..

Friday, August 31, 2012

Energy Independence By 2020

SEARCH BLOG: ENERGY and ROMNEY

In last night's nomination acceptance speech, Mitt Romney set a goal of having the U.S. become energy independent by 2020.  That's similar to John Kennedy's goal of putting a man on the moon... a huge leap of faith.

In the post "North American energy independence by 2020″, David Middleton gives all sorts of facts and figures that conclude that "Based on these numbers, North American energy independence could be achieved by 2027." Now that is North American, not U.S., energy independence.  Still, that is directionally where Mitt Romney wants to take the U.S. [h/t Anthony Watts]

There are many issues to be resolved ... and quickly ... if the U.S. is to seek energy independence.
  • Export policy - would ... and could ... the U.S. restrict its exports of oil, coal, and natural gas to force consumption at the local level?  Conversely, would the U.S. make it more difficult to import oil from beyond North America?
  • Regulation - can the Environmental Protection Agency regulations be reeled in?  Can the regulatory and permitting processes be streamlined and accelerated?
  • Taxation - will tax code reflect energy policy?
  • Overcoming entrenched opposition - becoming energy independent is not simply a matter of resources development.
The fastest way to energy independence is:
  • Reversal of the coal-to-natural-gas conversions occurring under the Obama administration for the generation of electricity.
  • Expansion of nuclear powered electricity generation to augment coal as a substitute for natural gas.
  • Development of a natural gas infrastructure to fuel vehicles as an alternative use of natural gas rather than to fuel electricity plants ... combined with incentives to automotive manufacturers to expand their offerings for natural gas powered vehicles ... a decades-old technology that is primarily limited to fleets at present.
  • Expansion of oil exploration in federally-controlled lands/offshore.
  • Streamlining the judicial process to settle a myriad of blocking lawsuits that will come from those special interests who are philosophically opposed to these actions.
This is all possible under the heading "anything is possible."  Is it probable or plausible?  A better question is: will someone lead the way in the face of fanatical and often irrational opposition?

MONDAY, AUGUST 31, 2009

2012 IS HERE

..

Monday, August 27, 2012

Capitalistic Laborers' Excessive Profits From Their Work

SEARCH BLOG: ECONOMY.

One hears the left complain about excessive corporate profits.  Corporations make money from the sale of their products or services... horrible!  They are taking advantage of their customers!  Why can't they sell their products and services for what it costs them... or a very, very small profit?  That should be incentive enough.

Well, how about the workers?  How many of them would be willing to work for just enough for subsistance?  Just pay enough to provide the minimum amount of food to keep them alive and able to work... just enough to buy the minimum amount of clothes to keep them from being naked... just enough to rent a small shelter to keep the rain and cold away.  Why pay so much that they can have money to spend on frivolous pastimes and unnecessary accumulation of material goods... or simply create a large stash?  That's just allowing workers to gain excessive profit from their labors.  At most they should receive a very, very small profit.  That should be incentive enough.


What's good for the goose....

2012 IS HERE

..

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Will Political Attitudes Toward Illegal Aliens Apply To Tax Cheaters?

SEARCH BLOG: IMMIGRATION and TAXES.

From the Huffington Post:

Republican Immigration Policy Grab Bag Could Become Party Platform
On Tuesday, Republican party platform drafters agreed to include language calling for a foreign guest worker program that could provide more American businesses with a font of legal and willing employees. 
Also included in the platform is a call to complete a border fence along the U.S.–Mexico line, an end of in-state tuition for undocumented students, a ban on policies that create sanctuary cites, and mandatory use of the e-verify database. Sanctuary cities are communities where police and other public officials are generally prohibited from inquiring about the immigration people's status unless absolutely necessary, while e-verify is a federal database used to verify workers' eligibility to hold a job in the United States. [full article]
So, it appears that the way our federal politicians now approach the "rule of law" is that if you have a large enough group ignoring the law, then the politicians feel compelled to ignore it, too.  First the was Obama's "it wasn't your fault you were brought here" amnesty.  Now the Republicans are concerned that following the law of the land might cost them votes among those who are not supposed to be able to vote, but who can't be identified because federal policy says that isn't very nice.

Well, just out of curiosity, what would be the response of politicians if say 50 million American citizens ... people who actually paid taxes... decided that they didn't like the way the federal government was spending their tax dollars and decided that they would not send in more tax dollars until the situation was "fixed."  Would those politicians suddenly be concerned that those taxpayers would no longer vote for them and decide that it was time for them to support not following tax laws?

I think not.

RELATED:

FRIDAY, APRIL 10, 2009

2012 IS HERE

..

Thursday, August 02, 2012

Obama's Plan: Expand Cities Through Defacto Annexation Of Suburbs

SEARCH BLOG: GOVERNMENT

An interesting article by Stanley Kurtz through the National Review:

President Obama is not a fan of America’s suburbs. Indeed, he intends to abolish them. With suburban voters set to be the swing constituency of the 2012 election, the administration’s plans for this segment of the electorate deserve scrutiny. Obama is a longtime supporter of “regionalism,” the idea that the suburbs should be folded into the cities, merging schools, housing, transportation, and above all taxation. To this end, the president has already put programs in place designed to push the country toward a sweeping social transformation in a possible second term. The goal: income equalization via a massive redistribution of suburban tax money to the cities. [full article]
Here in Michigan, we have efforts toward that end under the guise of "supporting the common good."  The Detroit Institute of Arts recently spent $2 million or nearly 10% of its operating budget to fund an advertising campaign designed to convince residents of counties near Detroit to implement a property tax increase to fund the DIA.  What was neglected in the appeal was mention of a large endowment and revenues equal to current operating costs.

Implied was the notion that the suburbs "owe" the City of Detroit, through the DIA, funding for simply providing such a great facility.  Conveniently forgotten was the fact that the City of Detroit and its racist administrations have systematically driven out the very people who would have patronized the DIA in the first place.

Obama's grand vision of "equality" and "social justice" through wealth redistribution is based on the faulty notion that people should not be able to vote with their feet when their government becomes dysfunctional for them or even antagonistic toward them.  Rather, Obama would enable these governments to chase those people beyond its own boundaries.

In the case of Detroit and it's floundering institutions, exactly the opposite should happen.


2012 IS HERE

..

Monday, July 23, 2012

Welcome To Obama's Unemployed Economy

SEARCH BLOG: ECONOMY

It has been 3-1/2 years since Barack Obama took over as President of the United States.  During that time, he claims to have "created" millions of jobs, but the record says that any job creation has been just enough to tread water... there has been no employment improvement during his term.  The U.S. Unemployment Rate under Obama is above January, 2009 when he took office. [source]


The number of unemployed persons [in thousands] has not been reduced since Barack Obama took over as President of the United States. [source]


During the time since Barack Obama took over as President of the United States, the U.S. national debt has skyrocketed, tax rates are about to go up, spending on government programs has run amok, and what do we have to show for it?
A stimulus bill equivalent to 1,567 Golden Gate bridges. A 2011 federal budget equivalent to 6,788 Golden Gate bridges. And yet we don't have a single one. 
Because that's not what Big Government does: Money-no-object government spends more and more money for less and less objects. For all the American economy has to show for it, President Bob the Builder took just shy of a trillion dollars in stimulus, stuck it in his wheelbarrow, pushed it halfway across the Golden Gate Bridge, and tossed it into the Pacific. 
Instead of roads and bridges, Obama-sized government funds stasis and sclerosis: The Hoover Dam of regulatory obstruction, the Golden Gateway to dependency. Last month, 80,000 Americans signed on to new jobs, but 85,000 Americans signed on for Social Security disability checks. Most of these people are not "disabled" as that term is generally understood. Rather, it's the U.S. economy that's disabled, and thus Obama incentivizes dependency. What Big Government is doing to those 85,000 "disabled" is profoundly wicked. Let me quote a guy called Mark Steyn, from his last book: 
"The evil of such a system is not the waste of money but the waste of people. Tony Blair's ministry discovered it was politically helpful to reclassify a chunk of the unemployed as 'disabled.' A fit, able-bodied 40-year-old who has been on disability allowance for a decade understands somewhere at the back of his mind that he is living a lie, and that not just the government but his family and his friends are colluding in that lie."   [source]
And so where do we stand on the cusp of President Barack Obama's re-election victory?

US poverty on track to rise to highest since 1960s

US poverty on track to reach 46-year high; suburbs, underemployed workers, children hit hard

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The ranks of America's poor are on track to climb to levels unseen in nearly half a century, erasing gains from the war on poverty in the 1960s amid a weak economy and fraying government safety net.
Census figures for 2011 will be released this fall in the critical weeks ahead of the November elections.
The Associated Press surveyed more than a dozen economists, think tanks and academics, both nonpartisan and those with known liberal or conservative leanings, and found a broad consensus: The official poverty rate will rise from 15.1 percent in 2010, climbing as high as 15.7 percent. Several predicted a more modest gain, but even a 0.1 percentage point increase would put poverty at the highest level since 1965.
Poverty is spreading at record levels across many groups, from underemployed workers and suburban families to the poorest poor. More discouraged workers are giving up on the job market, leaving them vulnerable as unemployment aid begins to run out. Suburbs are seeing increases in poverty, including in such political battlegrounds as Colorado, Florida and Nevada, where voters are coping with a new norm of living hand to mouth. [source]
So, Mr. President, just what about your term as President of the United States, qualifies you for a second term?  IT CAN'T BE THE ECONOMY.

The fact that your Democratic Party Congress and you conspired to pass the largest government program in history?  The fact that your Justice Department and you have repeatedly ignored laws passed by Congress?  The fact that you have an activist anti-energy/anti-business Environmental Protection Agency?  The fact that your foreign policy is focused on supporting the ascendancy of the Muslim Brotherhood throughout the Middle East and Northern Africa?


Tell us again why you should have another term.

2012 IS HERE

..

Monday, July 16, 2012

Your (Free) Tax Dollars At Work

SEARCH BLOG: GOVERNMENT

This is another example of how your federal government takes an idea and makes it a nightmare for taxpayers.


h/t: John F.

2012 IS HERE

..

Can"t Find It?

Use the SEARCH BLOG feature at the upper left. For example, try "Global Warming".

You can also use the "LABELS" below or at the end of each post to find related posts.

Blog Archive

Cost of Gasoline - Enter Your Zipcode or Click on Map

CO2 Cap and Trade

There is always an easy solution to every human problem—neat, plausible, and wrong.
Henry Louis Mencken (1880–1956)
“The Divine Afflatus,” A Mencken Chrestomathy, chapter 25, p. 443 (1949)
... and one could add "not all human problems really are."
It was beautiful and simple, as truly great swindles are.
- O. Henry
... The Government is on course for an embarrassing showdown with the European Union, business groups and environmental charities after refusing to guarantee that billions of pounds of revenue it stands to earn from carbon-permit trading will be spent on combating climate change.
The Independent (UK)

Tracking Interest Rates

Tracking Interest Rates

FEDERAL RESERVE & HOUSING

SEARCH BLOG: FEDERAL RESERVE for full versions... or use the Blog Archive pulldown menu.

February 3, 2006
Go back to 1999-2000 and see what the Fed did. They are following the same pattern for 2005-06. If it ain't broke, the Fed will fix it... and good!
August 29, 2006 The Federal Reserve always acts on old information... and is the only cause of U.S. recessions.
December 5, 2006 Last spring I wrote about what I saw to be a sharp downturn in the economy in the "rustbelt" states, particularly Michigan.
March 28, 2007
The Federal Reserve sees no need to cut interest rates in the light of adverse recent economic data, Ben Bernanke said on Wednesday.
The Fed chairman said ”to date, the incoming data have supported the view that the current stance of policy is likely to foster sustainable economic growth and a gradual ebbing in core inflation”.

July 21, 2007 My guess is that if there is an interest rate change, a cut is more likely than an increase. The key variables to be watching at this point are real estate prices and the inventory of unsold homes.
August 11, 2007 I suspect that within 6 months the Federal Reserve will be forced to lower interest rates before housing becomes a black hole.
September 11, 2007 It only means that the overall process has flaws guaranteeing it will be slow in responding to changes in the economy... and tend to over-react as a result.
September 18, 2007 I think a 4% rate is really what is needed to turn the economy back on the right course. The rate may not get there, but more cuts will be needed with employment rates down and foreclosure rates up.
October 25, 2007 How long will it be before I will be able to write: "The Federal Reserve lowered its lending rate to 4% in response to the collapse of the U.S. housing market and massive numbers of foreclosures that threaten the banking and mortgage sectors."
November 28, 2007 FED VICE CHAIRMAN DONALD KOHN
"Should the elevated turbulence persist, it would increase the possibility of further tightening in financial conditions for households and businesses," he said.

"Uncertainties about the economic outlook are unusually high right now," he said. "These uncertainties require flexible and pragmatic policymaking -- nimble is the adjective I used a few weeks ago."
http://www.reuters.com/

December 11, 2007 Somehow the Fed misses the obvious.
fed_rate_moves_425_small.gif
[Image from: CNNMoney.com]
December 13, 2007 [from The Christian Science Monitor]
"The odds of a recession are now above 50 percent," says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com. "We are right on the edge of a recession in part because of the Fed's reluctance to reduce interest rates more aggressively." [see my comments of September 11]
January 7, 2008 The real problem now is that consumers can't rescue the economy and manufacturing, which is already weakening, will continue to weaken. We've gutted the forces that could avoid a downturn. The question is not whether there will be a recession, but can it be dampened sufficiently so that it is very short.
January 11, 2008 This is death by a thousand cuts.
January 13, 2008 [N.Y. Times]
“The question is not whether we will have a recession, but how deep and prolonged it will be,” said David Rosenberg, the chief North American economist at Merrill Lynch. “Even if the Fed’s moves are going to work, it will not show up until the later part of 2008 or 2009.”
January 17, 2008 A few days ago, Anna Schwartz, nonagenarian economist, implicated the Federal Reserve as the cause of the present lending crisis [from the Telegraph - UK]:
The high priestess of US monetarism - a revered figure at the Fed - says the central bank is itself the chief cause of the credit bubble, and now seems stunned as the consequences of its own actions engulf the financial system. "The new group at the Fed is not equal to the problem that faces it," she says, daring to utter a thought that fellow critics mostly utter sotto voce.
January 22, 2008 The cut has become infected and a limb is in danger. Ben Bernanke is panicking and the Fed has its emergency triage team cutting rates... this time by 3/4%. ...

What should the Federal Reserve do now? Step back... and don't be so anxious to raise rates at the first sign of economic improvement.
Individuals and businesses need stability in their financial cost structures so that they can plan effectively and keep their ships afloat. Wildly fluctuating rates... regardless of what the absolute levels are... create problems. Either too much spending or too much fear. It's just not that difficult to comprehend. Why has it been so difficult for the Fed?

About Me

My photo
Michigan, United States
Air Force (SAC) captain 1968-72. Retired after 35 years of business and logistical planning, including running a small business. Two sons with advanced degrees; one with a business and pre-law degree. Beautiful wife who has put up with me for 4 decades. Education: B.A. (Sociology major; minors in philosopy, English literature, and German) M.S. Operations Management (like a mixture of an MBA with logistical planning)