READ ABOUT DETROIT AND SOLUTIONS TO ITS PROBLEMS. CLICK HERE.
Showing posts with label Immigration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Immigration. Show all posts

Monday, January 28, 2013

Ignoring Immigration Laws And Calling It Reform

SEARCH BLOG: IMMIGRATION.

The people of the United States have had a principle that the rule of law rather than the whims of leaders was necessary and required to have this republic function properly.  As with any principle, this one can be and has been subverted many times for many "good reasons."  This subversion has occurred millions of times in ways small and subtle to presidential "recess appointments."  Even the courts of the land will jump and twist through legal "double think" to fit judgments to political expediency.

Therefore, is it any wonder that immigration laws are subject to the same whims?  On the one hand, you have millions of people who have followed the letter and spirit of the law in their efforts to come to America and become citizens of these United States.  On the other hand, you have millions of people who have simply walked or driven in, taken up residence, used up local and national resources, demanded cultural accommodations, and created a wide crack in our "rule of law."

Some local law enforcement agencies have attempted to enforce the immigration laws, but have been penalized by the federal government which claims jurisdiction.  The same actions have been taken against states that attempt to enforce these laws within their borders.  The problem, of course, has been that the federal government has been more interested in asserting its power than enforcing the laws.  Consequently, we now have somewhere in excess of 10 million illegal aliens residing in the U.S.

This same federal government which paid people up to 99 weeks for not working has argued that these illegal aliens benefit the U.S. because they take jobs that nobody else will take.  You may find that to be a non-issue, but others will rightly ask what are the jobs that illegal aliens take that others refuse?  Construction?  Agriculture?  Service jobs?  And isn't it illegal to hire illegals?  Or is this another version of "don't ask, don't tell?"

Now the federal government says it is going to get serious about illegal immigration.  It will come up with a "path to citizenship" that makes the 10 million illegal aliens not so illegal.  A so-called "gang of eight" congressmen are working on just such a proposal.

A bipartisan group of eight senators plans to announce they have agreed on a set of principles for comprehensive immigration reform. 
The deal, which will be announced at a news conference Monday afternoon, covers border security, guest workers and employer verification, as well as a path to citizenship for the 11 million illegal immigrants already in this country. 
The eight senators expected to endorse the new principles are Democrats Charles Schumer of New York, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Michael Bennet of Colorado; and Republicans John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Marco Rubio of Florida and Jeff Flake of Arizona. [source]
The Miami Herald reports:
The Gang of Eight’s plan rests on four "pillars:"
1. Create a tough but fair path to citizenship for unauthorized immigrants currently living in the United States that is contingent upon securing our borders and tracking whether legal immigrants have left the country when required.
2. Reform our legal immigration system to better recognize the importance of characteristics that will help build the American economy and strengthen American families.
3. Create an effective employment verification system that will prevent identity theft and end the hiring of future unauthorized workers.
4. Establish an improved process for admitting future workers to serve our nation’s workforce needs, while simultaneously protecting all workers.
The plan is just a framework. So many of the hard details concerning how long people would wait for citizenship, how the border is declared secure and roughly how much it would all cost will have to be worked out in the coming months.
The Senate legislation, whenever it’s drafted, will also spell out how the visa process would be streamlined, what new types of work permits would be available and how the government plans to stop businesses from hiring illegal immigrants.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/01/28/3204447/rubio-senate-gang-of-eight-unveil.html#storylink=cpy
In other words, the law was not obeyed, so "let's make a deal."

I like that concept and think that should Sen. Diane Feinstein's firearms legislation pass that millions of American should simple ignore the law and force the federal government to "make a deal."  What?  You say that's not the same thing?  Of course not.  Senator Feinstein and her cohorts are attempting to ignore a Constitutional right that Americans have.  The "gang of eight" are simply trying to grant Constitutional protection to those who have broken the laws of the nation.  So, indeed, they are not the same thing.
..

Sunday, November 04, 2012

2012 Presidential Election: It's All About The Economy, War, Drugs, Debt, Regulations, Bureaucracy... And So Much More

SEARCH BLOG: OBAMA and ROMNEY.

This election has had some background music going on for quite awhile.  Johnny One Note has been playing "It's The Economy" and everyone is focused on that.

But that's a mistake.

True, the economic malaise is endemic.  As far as the jobless rate goes, the U.S. has flatlined during the Obama administration.  It's not just the unemployment rate that has been a problem.  It is the quality of employment that has created a sense of "we can't get there from here."

The American Enterprise Institute recently published this chart that shows a severe lack of quality employment during Obama's administration:


Not only has there been a minuscule improvement in hourly pay for the past four years... not keeping up with the cost increases in health care, food, and energy expenses for the average person... but as the AEI article states:
And these earnings numbers are not even inflation adjusted. If they were, they would be negative, which partly goes to the quality of the jobs being created and partly to the slow pace of growth and job creation. [source]
But that leaves other subjects glossed over or forgotten.  Perhaps the biggest festering issue that has been conveniently swept under the rug is the mess in Mexico and Latin America.  What, you've haven't heard anything about that?  Exactly.

From The Cato Institute on October 31, 2012:
A striking feature of the presidential debate on foreign policy was the total lack of attention given to Latin America —notably the drug violence wracking our next door neighbor, Mexico. Nearly 60,000 people have perished since 2006 in the Mexican government's military-led offensive against the country's powerful, ruthless drug cartels. But while President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney both obsessed about the Middle East, they virtually ignored Washington's relations with our southern neighbors. After a brief observation from Romney near the start of the debate that the region offered important — and neglected — economic opportunities for the United States, both candidates quickly abandoned the Western Hemisphere.
That was extraordinarily myopic. Given its geographic proximity, historical ties, and mounting importance as an arena for trade and investment, Latin America should be high on Washington's diplomatic and economic agenda. And near the top of the national security agenda should be the alarming developments involving the drug violence in Mexico. 
Killings continue to rise, and hardly a week passes without a new report of grisly acts south of the border. Portions of several key cities, especially Ciudad Juarez and Monterrey, are now virtual war zones. The Mexican government's control is becoming precarious in major swaths of territory, including the crucial northern states of Nuevo Leon, Chihuahua, and Tamaulipas. Several of the cartels, especially the Sinaloa cartel and the ultra-violent Zetas, pose a threat to the integrity of the Mexican state.
... 
Most importantly, Mexico's troubles are also beginning to afflict the United States. According to law enforcement authorities, Mexican drug organizations now have ties to criminal gangs in at least 230 American cities, including all of the 50 largest cities. The cartels' presence now even extends to relatively small cities and, in some cases, to rural counties — and not just in the southwestern states, but portions of the South, the Midwest, and other regions.  [FULL ARTICLE]
But our head of Homeland Security says things have never been better.

Meanwhile, the heavy hand of U.S. regulators presses down on the metaphorical back of the U.S. free market system with increasing force.  From Forbes:
Stultifying, job-killing regulation has been a hallmark of the Obama administration. An analysis by Susan Dudley, the director of the George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center reveals that with respect to “economically significant” regulations, defined as impacts of $100 million or more per year, Obama has been an outlier. While Presidents George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush “each published an average of 45 major rules a year…the outliers are Reagan, who issued, on average, a mere 23 major regulations per year; and Obama, who has published 54 per year on average, so far.” 
Compared with George W. Bush’s first term, the Obama administration has finalized roughly 30 more of these economically significant regulations, and there are many more on the way: According to Dudley, fully a third of the final major rules with private sector impacts have been postponed. And the government’s spring 2012 ”Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions”, which provides a preview of and transparency with respect to agency and OMB planning for the coming year, has still not been published. 
Such an unprecedented delay refutes the Obama administration’s claim of greater transparency and instead reveals an effort to hide what Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) has characterized as a “regulatory cliff” facing the economy if the president is reelected. Portman cites a broad spectrum of dubious, nanny-state, financial, environmental and consumer-product regulations in the pipeline that will cost consumers tens of billions of dollars and further vitiate the nation’s economic recovery.
Just wait until the EPA's hiding in the bushes new regulations come crashing down on the U.S.
President Obama is putting off major environmental regulations until after the November elections in order to avoid the political blowback of the economic damage those regulations will cause, according to a new Senate report.
Environmental regulators in the Obama administration “don’t want this economic pain to hit American families just before the election because it would cost President Obama votes,” states the report, released by Environment and Public Works ranking member Jim Inhofe (R-OK) on Thursday, “so they have simply decided to punt, intending to move full speed ahead if they gain a second term.” [FULL ARTICLE]
There are many who will say they can't discern a difference between a U.S. led by Barack Obama and a U.S. led by Mitt Romney.  They haven't been paying a lot of attention to what has been going on for four years.

Big government will not disappear because Mitt Romney is elected.  But government does not have to be an impediment to a strong system and that is what it has become increasingly under Barack Obama... and big government doesn't have to keep expanding exponentially.

It is time for change.

2012 IS HERE

..

Saturday, September 08, 2012

When Illegal Immigrants Speak At A National Political Convention, Tax Cheats Will Become Secretary Of The Treasury

SEARCH BLOG: IMMIGRATION and TAXES.


Oh wait... that has already happened.


Careless... avoidable... but that still qualifies him for Secretary of the Treasury in the Obama administration.

RELATED:

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 22, 2012


2012 IS HERE

..

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Obama Says: I Built That Company For You

SEARCH BLOG: OBAMA.

The leader of the "You didn't built that" country would take issue with the Ukrainian immigrant who built a company processing $10 billion worth of transactions annually:

Oleg Firer co-founded Unified Payments in 2007 at age 29. The company now processes $10 billion worth of transactions for 100,000 merchants a year, and it's growing quickly. 
Unified Payments isn't alone, though. Despite the tough economy, the median three-year growth of 2012 Inc. 500 companies was 1,436 percent - the highest rate in the list's 31-year history, according to Inc. (More From CNBC: Secrets of Venture Capitalists
When the list debuted, Firer, 35, was a boy living in Ukraine. He arrived in Brooklyn, New York, at age 12 and grew up in the borough's Brighton Beach neighborhood. He started his first business, a cell phone retailer, at age 17. His immigrant family didn't have much money when he was growing up; as a result, Firer focused on working hard. 
"I got where I am because I wouldn't take no for an answer," said Firer, who now lives in Miami with his family and drives a Bentley to work. "I always remember where I came from and that I could end up back there with nothing." [source]
Yes, if it were not for the government Obama built, there would be no shovel-ready roads on which those transactions could travel.

2012 IS HERE

..

Monday, August 13, 2012

Supreme Court: Illegal Activity Should Be Rewarded

SEARCH BLOG: GOVERNMENT

This is what happens when the rule of law is replaced with ethnic sensitivity.  We are a doomed nation.


2012 IS HERE

..

Friday, July 27, 2012

Not So "Affordable" Care Act To Strain Hospital Resources

SEARCH BLOG: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES

Obamacare... "fixes" everything "wrong" with our health care system.

From the liberal The New York Times:

Hospitals Are Worried About Cut in Fund for the Uninsured

President Obama’s health care law is putting new strains on some of the nation’s most hard-pressed hospitals, by cutting aid they use to pay for emergency care for illegal immigrants, which they have long been required to provide.
The federal government has been spending $20 billion annually to reimburse these hospitals — most in poor urban and rural areas — for treating more than their share of the uninsured, including illegal immigrants. The health care law will eventually cut that money in half, based on the premise that fewer people will lack insurance after the law takes effect.
But the estimated 11 million people now living illegally in the United States are not covered by the health care law. Its sponsors, seeking to sidestep the contentious debate over immigration, excluded them from the law’s benefits. [full article]
Why that is just astounding!   Who would have thought that the mandate to provide hospital care to the uninsured combined with the un-funding of that mandate and the relaxation of any attempt to stop illegal entry into the country would have a negative impact on our hospitals?  That was simply unforeseeable.


In order to understand that situation, one needs to ask, "Who built that situation?"  Well, obviously not the hospitals because they didn't build the hospitals... or the "Affordable" Care Act



2012 IS HERE

..

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

California Declares Itself A Separate Nation With No Immigration Controls

SEARCH BLOG: CALIFORNIA

When it comes to states, California has demonstrated that it doesn't care about such things as producing enough power for its residents, providing enough water for its agriculture, or being able to pay its bills.  What California does care about is protecting the "rights" of those who are helping to suck California dry.


Los Angeles (CNN) -- The California Senate has passed a so-called "anti-Arizona" bill to prevent racial profiling by police and allow local law agencies to ignore federal requests to detain nonviolent illegal immigrants for deportation, a state lawmaker said.
The proposal, called the California Trust Act, would be the first state law imposing "detainer reform," though local governments in Illinois, Wisconsin and elsewhere have enacted similar measures, according to California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano's office.
No other states have legislation similar to what is now being considered in California, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
The California bill would set standards that allow police not to respond to requests from U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement to detain an illegal immigrant -- except in cases where the immigrant is a serious or violent convicted felon, Ammiano said in a fact sheet about his proposed bill. Ammiano is a Democrat from San Francisco. [full story]

And one might ask ... why?

2012 IS HERE

..

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Voter Fraud Likely To Increase In 2012

SEARCH BLOG: ELECTIONS

Now that Obamacare has cleared the courts, the next big obstacle will be the implementation.  Now that Obama has administratively circumvented immigration laws, the next big obstacle will be implementation.

What does that mean?  Simply that there are only five months remaining until it is determined which philosophy will run the country beyond 2012.  If Republicans gain control of Congress and the White House, Obamacare and and the administrative "free pass" to illegals will not be implemented.

What does that mean?  The biggest hint is the Department of Justice effort to prevent states from requiring voter identification.  If the Obama-run DOJ is successful in allowing "mystery" voters to register and vote, then Obama will be re-elected and the Democratic Party will enjoy gains in Congress.  Simple as that.

2012 IS HERE

..

Monday, June 25, 2012

Supreme Court Invalidates Arizona Immigration Law And The 10th Amendment

SEARCH BLOG: IMMIGRATION


Today, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that most of Arizona's immigration law was an infringement on U.S. Federal law.  As a result, about all that Arizona can do regarding illegal immigrants is stand back and  watch ... nothing done by the U.S. Customs and Immigration Service.  That, combined with the Department of Justice's penchant for gun-running and either getting border guards killed or putting border guards in jail, results in a giant boost for the Democratic Party's voter registration efforts.

It's a sad day when the Supreme Court rules that only the federal government can enforce federal laws that the Executive Branch of the federal government refuses to enforce.  Sorry Congress, you are outvoted 2-1. And states really have no power to sue the federal government to enforce federal laws.  States' rights?  No such thing anymore.  This, combined with the Commerce Clause, effectively negates the 10th amendment.

Next order of business: making Cinco de Mayo an national holiday.

2012 IS HERE

..

Friday, June 15, 2012

U.S. Changes Immigration Policy

SEARCH BLOG: IMMIGRATION

The Obama administration is hoping that their newest side-step on immigration law will bring a landslide of Hispanic voters out in November.  From the BBC:

US to stop young migrant deportations
The US is to end deportations of illegal immigrants who came to the US as children and to offer the chance to apply for work permits. 
Under a new plan, those aged between 16 and 30 who have lived in the US continuously for five years would be eligible to stay in the US. 
The plan, which goes into effect immediately, is expected to affect as many as 800,000 people. 
The move is seen as addressing a key Latino concern in an election year.[more]
Only one question remains then: what happens to the older folks that were brought to the U.S. by these children and young adults?
 
..

Tuesday, April 03, 2012

Immigration And Customs Enforcement Arrests 2,901

SEARCH BLOG: IMMIGRATION

From The New York Times:

WASHINGTON — The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency [ICE] announced on Wednesday that it had arrested 2,901 immigrants who have criminal records, highlighting the Obama administration’s policy of focusing on such people while putting less emphasis on deporting illegal immigrants who pose no demonstrated threat to public safety.
From Washington's point of view, that is good news.  They got almost three thousand criminals off the street.

From a citizen's point of view, that is bad news.  Lack of immigration and border enforcement allowed these 2,901 "immigrant criminals" to enter the country illegally.

But what about the millions of others who are in the U.S. illegally? How many of those have committed crimes other than being here illegally? Well, according to the Obama administration, breaking the law is no crime if Obama doesn't like the law and if Obama's enforcers haven't detected any crimes.  We will just have to take our chances that 2,901 represents a significant portion of those "other crimes" committed by the approximately 11,000,000 illegals.

So, why is The New York Times writing about "immigrants"?  They are simply "long term undocumented visitors"... some of whom commit other crimes than the non-crime of breaking immigration laws.  Nothing to see hear.  Just move along.

RELATED:

Immigration Law As Required By The Constitution

2012 IS HERE

..

Tuesday, February 07, 2012

Ron Paul Was Against It Before He Was For It

SEARCH BLOG: IMMIGRATION


10 second commercial... then video starts



Dr. Paul, are you going to not build a fence, but instead line up all of the military personnel you remove from the rest of the world... along our southern border?

What are we missing?

2012 IS HERE

..

Monday, September 20, 2010

Integration Or Isolation

SEARCH BLOG: ISLAM

While many nations are struggling with the issue of massive immigration and separatist cultures, the occasional bright spot emerges.

From The Wall Street Journal:

"We're all victims here," said Ali Saleh, a Muslim resident and member of the Bell Association to Stop the Abuse, which hosts the community meetings. "Sad to say, but that's what's bringing us together."
A Pew Research report released last month showed 30% of Americans have a positive view of Islam, compared with 42% who held a positive view in 2005. Muslim-American leaders have urged Muslims to counter that image by becoming more visibly involved in political life, but with limited success. Bell has the potential to become the kind of turnaround Muslim-Americans are after as the nation debates their place in American society. [full story]
Virtually every group involved in mass immigration has been the target of some sort of distrust... being different does that.  What has made Muslim immigration somewhat unique is that it has been seen as a direct and violent threat to this nation... and other host nations.  Muslims have been their own worst enemy in this regard.  Signs proclaiming "death to infidels" go a long way in securing this distrust and making any positive relationships exceedingly difficult.

With that in mind, the Muslims in Bell are not your typical Muslim immigrant in the mind of most Americans. The Lebanese have traditionally been a most non-Islamist Muslim group... more western than traditional Arab in their approach to life.  Secular matters are far more important to most Lebanese than concern about praying five times a day and converting infidels.  Becoming part of an American community is far more natural for them than the typical immigrant from Yemen or Saudi Arabia.

Bell, California is fortunate to have this group of Muslims... instead of this group... which can only trigger a backlash.



2012 IS GETTING CLOSER

..

Sunday, September 19, 2010

European Backlash Started

SEARCH BLOG: ISLAM and IMMIGRATION


"This sends a positive signal that the years of extremely liberal immigration policy, setting Sweden apart from the rest of Europe, are over. Now the Swedish people are demanding a more restrictive immigration policy and a more responsible integration policy, just like in the rest of Europe." [full story]



This shortly after France says no to the burqa.

And, of course, in the Netherlands there was the attempt to silence Geert Wilders who is the most outspoken politician to limit Muslims in Europe... and that was followed by dramatic gains for his political party.

These posts addressed this eventuality beginning with :

European Backlash - Step 1 Taken
European Backlash - Step 2 [note the prediction]
European Backlash - Step 3
..

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Harry Reid Almost Got It Right

SEARCH BLOG:

Republicans dismissed as a political ploy Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's announcement Tuesday that he would attach a proposal giving young illegal immigrants a pathway to citizenship on an upcoming defense bill.
With Reid facing a tough election against Sharron Angle in Hispanic-heavy Nevada, lawmakers criticized the majority leader for adding the so-called DREAM Act to the defense bill. They accused him of injecting unnecessary controversy into the routine spending bill for political gain. [source]
Harry may be on to something old.  Perhaps he should model his proposed legislation around this:
The French Foreign Legion was created by Louis Philippe, the King of the French, on 10 March 1831. The direct reason was that foreigners were forbidden to serve in the French Army after the 1830 July Revolution, so the Legion was created to allow the government a way around this restriction. The purpose of the Legion was to remove disruptive elements from society and put them to use fighting the enemies of France. Recruits included failed revolutionaries from the rest of Europe, soldiers from the disbanded foreign regiments, and troublemakers in general, both foreign and French. Algeria was designated as the Legion's home.
In late 1831, the first Legionnaires landed in Algeria, the country that would be the Legion's homeland for 130 years and shape its character. The early years in Algeria were hard for Legionnaires because they were often sent to the worst postings, received the worst assignments and were generally uninterested in the new colony of the French.  [source]
So instead of the DREAM Act, how about the USFL Act?  No, not the old football league.  Our very own Foreign Legion.  After a suitable period of... no, not two years... five years in places like Afghanistan or Iraq or anywhere else no one else wanted to be, the former illegal aliens would then be welcomed back as citizens provided they had served without violating the military code of conduct... meaning they had gotten written verification that their opposing combatants were not hiding behind women and children before they fired their weapons.  Former drug dealers and gang members would be exempt from the verification rule and could bring any weapons they felt comfortable using.

I'd call that a "twofer"... use illegal aliens to fight terrorist organizations.  That's really getting something in exchange for "amnesty."

2012 IS GETTING CLOSER

..

Sunday, August 15, 2010

This Is Not About Swedish Meatballs

SEARCH BLOG: IMMIGRATION

From Sweden [click the title below and let Google translate it]:

Oro i Karlskrona

Invasion av fredliga Malmöbor väntas till Karlskrona den 12 juni nästa Ã¥r dÃ¥ EM-kvalmatchen i handboll mot Israel ska spelas. Men idrottsförvaltningen i kommunen avrÃ¥der bestämt med tanke pÃ¥ vad som hände i Malmö när Sverige mötte Israel i Davis Cup där förra Ã¥ret.

Karlskronas kommunalråd Karl-Gösta Svenson (M) tycker inte man ska blanda ihop idrott och politik. - Jag har inte sagt nej till matchen, säger han.

"Ramadankriget" kallar araberna kriget mot Israel år 1973. Så det gäller att vara på sin vakt denna månad, när "ungdomar" fastar på dagarna och festar på kvällarna. Men för att återgå till sportnyheterna:

Caroline Glick är en amerikansk-israelisk journalist som bland annat medverkade i "We Con the World", en satirisk video om Gaza-flottiljens försök att bryta den israeliska blockaden. Hon skrev förra Ã¥ret:

"Trots upprepade önskemål från Israel vägrade svenska myndigheter att flytta matchen från Malmö till Stockholm. Med sin enorma muslimsk befolkning är Malmö platsen där några av de värsta islamistiska våldshändelserna mot icke-muslimer - och i synnerhet judar, kvinnor och flickor - i västvärlden har ägt rum.

De protesterande hävdade att deras önskan att mörda Israeliska tennisspelare berodde på "Operation Cast Lead". Men detta är ren propaganda. Deras önskan att mörda Ram och Haddad härstammar inte från Israels militära åtgärder för att försvara sin medborgare, utan från deras hat mot den judiska staten. Och detta hat kommer från samma källa som deras kvinnofientlighet, deras hat mot USA och därför stöder de till exempel Osama bin Laden och Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

En rapport från svenska regeringen visade att under 2004 ökade antalet våldtäkter med 50 procent i hela landet.
I en rapport från Malmöpolisen konstateras att 68 procent av våldtäktsmännen var minoriteter.
Den islamiska experten Robert Spencer har konstaterat att islamisk undervisning anser att våldtäkt är en legitim akt gentemot kvinnor och flickor, som beter sig på ett "icke-islamiskt" sätt.
PÃ¥ flera ställen i Skandinavien samt i muslimska omrÃ¥den i Frankrike, har kvinnor börjat bära slöjor för att skydda sig mot ambulerande gäng av muslimska unga män." länk


Även i Ã¥r har antalet vÃ¥ldtäkter ökat med 50 procent. Den blÃ¥ kurvan kommer frÃ¥n BRÃ… och den röda frÃ¥n Migrationsverket, via Snaphanen.

Related:
  • European Backlash - Step 1 Taken
  • European Backlash - Step 2
  • European Backlash - Step 3
  • European Backlash - Step 4
  • European Backlash - Step 5
  • European Backlash - Step 6
  • European Backlash - Step 7
  • European Backlash - Step 8
It's coming there and it's coming here.

2012 IS GETTING CLOSER

..

Sunday, August 01, 2010

Open Borders Are Nothing To Fear

SEARCH BLOG: IMMIGRATION


Okay, then.  But why is it a one-way open border?  And when did free movement across borders become a right?  I must have missed that on the news.  Does that go for 200-300 million Chinese, too?

2012 IS GETTING CLOSER

..

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

The Court Has Shown The Way To Control Illegal Immigration

SEARCH BLOG:  ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

The U.S. District Court in Arizona decision to let stand certain provisions of the Arizona HR1070 now points the way for states to "amend" their own laws in ways that will legally enforce immigration law without stepping on the toes of the Federal Government which has chosen to not enforce the laws it is legally required to enforce.

States cannot arbitrarily seek to verify the immigration or citizenship status of a person because they "look illegal" and because it is the bailiwick of the Federalis to handle matters related to controlling illegal immigration.  But the states can enforce matters related to state prerogatives as long as it is done in a way that is not blatantly discriminatory.  What might those matters be?

  • Driver's licenses - all people wishing to have the privilege of driving within a state must have a valid driver's license or be subject to penalties defined by the state.  All people seeking a driver's license must produce a U.S. birth certificate or immigration papers showing naturalization or legal entry to the state.
  • Schools - all children attending a school supported by state funds must produce a U.S. birth certificate or immigration papers showing naturalization or legal entry to the state.  This is not a requirement to be enforced for "home schooling."
  • Employment - all persons seeking employment within a state must produce a U.S. birth certificate or immigration papers showing naturalization or legal entry to the state. [Employers are already required to check such status under Arizona law].
  • Welfare - all persons seeking state assistance must produce a U.S. birth certificate or immigration papers showing naturalization or legal entry to the state.
Hospitals and those seeking care at a hospital are exempt.  The rest are within the bailiwick of the state to set the basis for having the state grant privileges or providing support.  As long as all persons are required to provide such proof, there is no discrimination nor is there an issue with the federal government which does not have jurisdiction in matters of state roads, schools, employment matters, or welfare.

As governor of a state such as Arizona, I would test the Federal Government at every turn... and I would have the support of legal residents of the state in doing so.  I would try any person who attempted to use counterfeit citizenship or immigration papers under the fraud laws of the state.

The message should be clear: You can come to this state because the Federal Government refuses to do its job, but don't expect to be welcomed or supported.  Get in line with the rest of the immigrants from around the world and show that you belong legally.

2012 IS GETTING CLOSER

..

Arizona Immigration Law Not Fully Enjoined

SEARCH BLOG:  IMMIGRATION

The U.S. District Court for the "District" of Arizona has enjoined certain portions of the Arizona immigration law and allow the following:

Other than seeking a preliminary injunction as to “S.B. 1070,” the United States has
not made any argument to preliminarily enjoin and the Court therefore does not enjoin the
following provisions of S.B. 1070:

Section 1 of S.B. 1070
no A.R.S. citation:
providing the intent of the legislation
-2-
Case 2:10-cv-01413-SRB Document 87
Filed 07/28/10 Page 3 of 36
Portions of Section 2 of S.B. 1070
A.R.S. § 11-1051(A):
prohibiting Arizona officials, agencies, and political
subdivisions from limiting enforcement of federal
immigration laws
A.R.S. § 11-1051(C)-(F): requiring that state officials work with federal officials
with regard to unlawfully present aliens
A.R.S. § 11-1051(G)-(L): allowing legal residents to sue any state official, agency,
or political subdivision for adopting a policy of
restricting enforcement of federal immigration laws to
less than the full extent permitted by federal law
Section 4 of S.B. 10702
A.R.S. § 13-2319:
amending the crime of human smuggling
Portion of Section 5 of S.B. 1070
A.R.S. § 13-2928(A)-(B): creating a crime for stopping a motor vehicle to pick up
day laborers and for day laborers to get in a motor
vehicle if it impedes the normal movement of traffic
Section 7 of S.B. 1070
A.R.S. § 23-212:
amending the crime of knowing employment of
unauthorized aliens
Section 8 of S.B. 1070
A.R.S. § 23-212.01:
amending the crime of intentional employment of
unauthorized aliens
Section 9 of S.B. 1070
A.R.S. § 23-214:
amending the requirements for checking employment
eligibility
Section 11 of S.B. 1070
A.R.S. § 41-1724:
creating the gang and immigration intelligence team
enforcement mission fund
Sections 12 & 13 of S.B. 1070
no A.R.S. citation:
administering S.B. 1070
So... while the police may not check the immigration status of the people stopped for traffic violations or other crimes nor require persons to carry their immigration papers, the highlighted sections above seem to indicate that:
  1. residents can effectively eliminate "sanctuary cities" and the officials who obstruct immigration law enforcement, and
  2. create significant barriers to employment of illegals.
Those two aspects of the law should be adequate.  This is not what the Obama administration wanted.


2012 IS GETTING CLOSER

..

Monday, July 12, 2010

It Is Time For Islam To Leave The 7th Century

SEARCH BLOG: ISLAM



Is this what is coming to Western civilization? [H/T Dick P.]

Sorry, but "multiculturalism" only goes so far....  That has no place in the Western tradition.

This also has no place.

"Multiculturalism" does not mean replacing American traditions and values.  It means accepting them and blending with them.  Being whatever-American means you take pleasure in the ethnic traditions and food and history of your heritage, but your focus and allegiance and existence is being American.  You add your distinctiveness to the American tradition while embracing the American tradition.

Those who want to elevate their heritage above the tradition and values and laws of America only detract from the totality of this nation... or any nation that may have welcomed them.  Those who believe their heritage demands special treatment in America are not... and cannot be... true Americans.  People who have immigrated [legally, of course] have been welcomed to allow them to become part of of something different... better... in their lives... not to destroy it.  If their politics and/or religion prevent that... they should not be welcomed.
"... the same Wahaj articulated a rather different vision from his mild and moderate invocation in the House. If only Muslims were more clever politically, he told his New Jersey listeners, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate. "If we were united and strong, we'd elect our own emir [leader] and give allegiance to him. . . . [T]ake my word, if 6-8 million Muslims unite in America, the country will come to us." " [source]
The point is not an issue of whether this statement is the plan of an idiot.  The point is that there are people who agree with the statement and would act on it.

Unfortunately, there are those who believe that American tradition and values require America to accept those who do not accept our tradition and values and laws.  They are wrong.  It is the responsibility of those who would come to America to embrace the American values... not replace them.

UPDATE

Maybe there should be a few questions asked before blindly accepting "multiculturism."
YEMEN: Islamic lawmaker decries child marriage ban as part of 'Western agenda'
April 18, 2010 | 10:27 am

Al-Hazmi
The recent death of 13-year old Yemeni child bride Elham Assi, who reportedly bled to death last week after being tied down and forced to have sex with her 23-year-old husband, has sparked outrage among rights activists in Yemen.
They are now stepping up their lobbying efforts to push for the implementation of a child marriage ban. 
But that may prove a daunting challenge since fierce opposition against a ban on child brides still runs high among some religious leaders and conservatives.
One can understand his concern.  What woman would want to be married to that?

2012 IS GETTING CLOSER

..

Can"t Find It?

Use the SEARCH BLOG feature at the upper left. For example, try "Global Warming".

You can also use the "LABELS" below or at the end of each post to find related posts.

Blog Archive

Cost of Gasoline - Enter Your Zipcode or Click on Map

CO2 Cap and Trade

There is always an easy solution to every human problem—neat, plausible, and wrong.
Henry Louis Mencken (1880–1956)
“The Divine Afflatus,” A Mencken Chrestomathy, chapter 25, p. 443 (1949)
... and one could add "not all human problems really are."
It was beautiful and simple, as truly great swindles are.
- O. Henry
... The Government is on course for an embarrassing showdown with the European Union, business groups and environmental charities after refusing to guarantee that billions of pounds of revenue it stands to earn from carbon-permit trading will be spent on combating climate change.
The Independent (UK)

Tracking Interest Rates

Tracking Interest Rates

FEDERAL RESERVE & HOUSING

SEARCH BLOG: FEDERAL RESERVE for full versions... or use the Blog Archive pulldown menu.

February 3, 2006
Go back to 1999-2000 and see what the Fed did. They are following the same pattern for 2005-06. If it ain't broke, the Fed will fix it... and good!
August 29, 2006 The Federal Reserve always acts on old information... and is the only cause of U.S. recessions.
December 5, 2006 Last spring I wrote about what I saw to be a sharp downturn in the economy in the "rustbelt" states, particularly Michigan.
March 28, 2007
The Federal Reserve sees no need to cut interest rates in the light of adverse recent economic data, Ben Bernanke said on Wednesday.
The Fed chairman said ”to date, the incoming data have supported the view that the current stance of policy is likely to foster sustainable economic growth and a gradual ebbing in core inflation”.

July 21, 2007 My guess is that if there is an interest rate change, a cut is more likely than an increase. The key variables to be watching at this point are real estate prices and the inventory of unsold homes.
August 11, 2007 I suspect that within 6 months the Federal Reserve will be forced to lower interest rates before housing becomes a black hole.
September 11, 2007 It only means that the overall process has flaws guaranteeing it will be slow in responding to changes in the economy... and tend to over-react as a result.
September 18, 2007 I think a 4% rate is really what is needed to turn the economy back on the right course. The rate may not get there, but more cuts will be needed with employment rates down and foreclosure rates up.
October 25, 2007 How long will it be before I will be able to write: "The Federal Reserve lowered its lending rate to 4% in response to the collapse of the U.S. housing market and massive numbers of foreclosures that threaten the banking and mortgage sectors."
November 28, 2007 FED VICE CHAIRMAN DONALD KOHN
"Should the elevated turbulence persist, it would increase the possibility of further tightening in financial conditions for households and businesses," he said.

"Uncertainties about the economic outlook are unusually high right now," he said. "These uncertainties require flexible and pragmatic policymaking -- nimble is the adjective I used a few weeks ago."
http://www.reuters.com/

December 11, 2007 Somehow the Fed misses the obvious.
fed_rate_moves_425_small.gif
[Image from: CNNMoney.com]
December 13, 2007 [from The Christian Science Monitor]
"The odds of a recession are now above 50 percent," says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com. "We are right on the edge of a recession in part because of the Fed's reluctance to reduce interest rates more aggressively." [see my comments of September 11]
January 7, 2008 The real problem now is that consumers can't rescue the economy and manufacturing, which is already weakening, will continue to weaken. We've gutted the forces that could avoid a downturn. The question is not whether there will be a recession, but can it be dampened sufficiently so that it is very short.
January 11, 2008 This is death by a thousand cuts.
January 13, 2008 [N.Y. Times]
“The question is not whether we will have a recession, but how deep and prolonged it will be,” said David Rosenberg, the chief North American economist at Merrill Lynch. “Even if the Fed’s moves are going to work, it will not show up until the later part of 2008 or 2009.
January 17, 2008 A few days ago, Anna Schwartz, nonagenarian economist, implicated the Federal Reserve as the cause of the present lending crisis [from the Telegraph - UK]:
The high priestess of US monetarism - a revered figure at the Fed - says the central bank is itself the chief cause of the credit bubble, and now seems stunned as the consequences of its own actions engulf the financial system. "The new group at the Fed is not equal to the problem that faces it," she says, daring to utter a thought that fellow critics mostly utter sotto voce.
January 22, 2008 The cut has become infected and a limb is in danger. Ben Bernanke is panicking and the Fed has its emergency triage team cutting rates... this time by 3/4%. ...

What should the Federal Reserve do now? Step back... and don't be so anxious to raise rates at the first sign of economic improvement.
Individuals and businesses need stability in their financial cost structures so that they can plan effectively and keep their ships afloat. Wildly fluctuating rates... regardless of what the absolute levels are... create problems. Either too much spending or too much fear. It's just not that difficult to comprehend. Why has it been so difficult for the Fed?

About Me

My photo
Michigan, United States
Air Force (SAC) captain 1968-72. Retired after 35 years of business and logistical planning, including running a small business. Two sons with advanced degrees; one with a business and pre-law degree. Beautiful wife who has put up with me for 4 decades. Education: B.A. (Sociology major; minors in philosopy, English literature, and German) M.S. Operations Management (like a mixture of an MBA with logistical planning)