Ethnic Divisiveness - Unintended Consequences

Headline: Metro Detroit sprawl separates blacks, jobs

• Slavery
• Civil War
• Jim Crow
• Black Activism
• Race Riots
• White Flight
• Racial Card Politics
  
• Decay

The old saw "two wrongs don't make a right" really applies here. Actually a lot more wrongs than two.

Detroit is caught in an outward spiral... a reverse black hole sort of effect... nothing in seems to want to stay.

Eventually, however, the process will reverse... almost naturally. It has to. The city is too strategically located to be abandoned entirely. But it has not yet reached its nadir. Detroit's present population is about 900,000. When it reaches about 750,000, there will be imminent threat of collapse. The state will be forced to step in. At that point, there will be significant opportunities to remake Detroit into a model city.

• Reclamation of large, blighted tracts for development
• buy-out of remaining residents
• tear-down of existing properties
• rezoning to achieve mix of residential, business and public areas
• bring in high-end developers... gated communities...
  
• Tax reformation
• hiatus on property taxes for residents and businesses moving into the city
• overall reduction of taxes residents and businesses must pay in the city
• privatization of city services such as garbage disposal

A more radical approach would be to adopt a Toronto-style form of regional government and land-use, but that would be very difficult. It would, however, integrate the area of Detroit within a larger, more stable government framework. It would eliminate the fundamental differences in taxation and services and let the core area of Detroit take advantage of its inherent geographic advantage. It is probably unworkable because:

• Black Detroiters would have to relinquish significant political power
  
• White suburbanites would have to relinquish insulation and isolation from the problems of Detroit
• Taxes would increase overall
• Racial issues would have to be addressed

Another radical approach would be to reduce Detroit to a 5 mile radius from the foot of Woodward Ave and then create several new cities along the outer ring or let existing cities annex adjacent areas. This would create a more manageable central area that could focus on high-end businesses and more affluent residents. The outer areas would be more traditional smaller cities that could focus on small business and the needs of its residents.



Regardless of the solution... waiting... creating a metropolitan area government... reducing the geography of Detroit... the present situation seems untenable. It is not about "unregulated employment growth" that the Brookings Institution cites. It is the unintended consequences of wrong decisions over many, many decades. Eventually, this area must bite the bullet... or continue to see them flying.

Addendum

Uncertainties

It's good to know that the earth's temperature has risen from the extremely cold late 19th century by 1 degree C. All kinds of record lows during that period.

There really are a lot of agendas out there... including the EPA's. One needs to be very careful about which bandwagon one joins. Point: one factor has changed slightly in a very complex equation that is not fully understood... one factor that may or may not be a long-term issue.

Environmental Extremism (sigh)

Note to Anonymous from yesterday's post: 200 years seems like a long time, but go back to this for a long perspective.

Some relatively warm years recently have created a geological micro-focusing on a very... very... short time period where a change in climate appears... appears... to be occurring. Rapid change in climate is not without precedent... and has had nothing to do with man's involvement. Nevertheless, the result is that there is a focus on atmospheric carbon dioxide as a "cause" of "climate change." It's a popular concept for those who would like to see the elimination of large cars and trucks... and a return to what??? but who... conveniently... oppose new nuclear power generating plants that are the only viable means of reducing the use of oil and coal for producing electricity... and having enough electricity available to convert from an oil-based to a hydrogen-based economy. And who... conveniently... support a treaty that does nothing to affect the most rapidly growth contributors of all pollution... China and India.

So my "needling" about Environmental Extremism does have a "point"... those that shout the loudest rarely have a viable alternative... and many of their alternatives (such as wind turbines) are vigorously opposed by other "environmentalists" who see them as dangerous to birds or ugly or have some other reason.

People rally easily to "noble" sounding causes without really thinking through alternatives and implications... and with the weapon of short-sightedness. It reminds me of the guy who "voted for the ice age coming before he voted against it" (for those of you old enough to remember the winters and cold summers of the 1950s... snow in July in Wisconsin... something I saw more than once... came during a time that there was a lot of talk about a new ice age... something that happens when a few years of unusual weather comes along).

One other thought... those who use "average global temperatures" are truly kidding themselves into believing that it is possible to rely on readings from 100 years ago for comparisons with data obtained by today's technology.

Here is a site that is worth looking at to get further insight to what I have written about:
http://www.techcentralstation.com/climatechange.html

Global Warming Update

• Iran gripped by wintry weather
• Melbourne shivers as temperature plunges
• Temperature in Minnesota plummets to minus 54
• Hungary hit by record temperature low
• N.C. weathered record low on Monday
• MIT team achieves coldest temperature ever

Okay, ignore the last one.

Miami Beach...

Okay, Boston

Back From The Future

While speculating about the future can be "fun", there is a serious component to it... present decisions affect future abilities. Simply responding to present issues does not necessarily prepare us for what is likely to occur.

• Headline: Automakers must toughen tactics to fight rampant Chinese piracy
• Headline: GM, Asia and the new reality
• Headline: The Battle For Number 1
• Headline: GM seems to be stuck in neutral after great strides in overall quality
• Headline: China cars start at $7,000
• Headline: GM rides fast start to big profits in China

Confusing?

We get our information from so many different perspectives that seeing the larger picture is difficult. GM (and other automobile manufactureres) are constantly trying to take advantage of potential opportunities without making disastrous decisions. Headlines oversimplify out of necessity... grab the reader without taking up space.

So let's summarize where the headlines are going:

• GM is facing great competition from Toyota for leadership in world automotive sales and profits
• GM's products are aging, it has huge cost burdens, and some of its operations are creating distractions and inefficiencies
  
• China appears to be a major market opportunity and is presently yielding growth and profit for both GM and Toyota
• But there is an underlying problem in dealing with China that may override the benefits presently being realized including outright piracy of GM designs and manufacturing techniques by Chinese firms that will bring GMs growth in China to a grinding halt
  
• And there is a possibility that GMs foray into China may be creating its next competitor in the U.S. ... the Chevy Chery

Unlike Toyota, GM does not enjoy a market protected from non-U.S. manufacturers. The U.S. government encourages "free trade" which is loosely translated into "bring in the cheap goods" regardless of consequences. That includes ignoring issues of outright unfair trade practices by Asian countries... practices that are illegal in the U.S. It's a Faustian deal.

Before the future arrives, it is time to address what makes GM not tick... tock, tick, tock....

2020 Conclusion

15 years... not that far into the future. How will things be the same; how will things be different?

The same: the U.S. will still be the most formidable economic and military power in the world.

Different:

• U.S. will face greater challenges in:
• Education
• Growing minorities population with less tendency toward high school/college graduation or PhDs.
• Need to provide alternative to academic-oriented education
• Economy
• Continued pressure on manufacturing from both China and India
• Real possibility of a currency crisis stemming from trade deficits
• Trade focus may begin to shift to the "Americas" and away from Europe and Asia
• High level of illegal immigration of primarily poor, undereducated Hispanics plus an aging White population will create enormous strains on social programs that will require significant changes in the programs or increases in taxes
• International relations
• Gradual reduction of military efforts regarding Middle East/Islamic issues in favor of increasing European Union/Russian responsibility as those areas become increasingly sensitive to the Muslim Influx
  
• Recognition of China as both an antagonisic military and economic competitor may force U.S. to consider creating stronger ties with India... despite economic competition... because India will be seen as having interests similar to the U.S. regarding China and Islamic activism
• Recognition of economic opportunities "south of the border" in Latin and South America leading to greater cooperation and trade in those areas
  
  
• European Union faces new directions
  
• Turkey's efforts to join the EU have an upside and downside
• A large, growing market and educated population can be a major contributor to the EU
• The "Muslim Influx" into northern Europe is a potential source of social upheaval that could set back the EU indefinitely
• Other eastern European nations may press for membership which might cause both political and economic issues for the region
• Relationship with Russia must be addressed
  
  
• Asia faces growing pains
• China is a major question mark
• Will it become a "legitimate" business environment or continue as a place for pirates and opportunists
• Will it seek to use its growing military power to coerce the rest of Asia
• Will it seek to expand its influence more into the western hemisphere, including Latin and South America
• India may become an economic superpower or collapse from internal and external pressure
• China and India could become mutual markets for each other
• India could become bogged down in escalating conflicts with Muslim countries and Muslim minorities within India
• AIDS could become a sociological disaster among the hundreds of millions in poverty
• Central and Western Asia will continue to be a source of Islamic issues for the rest of Asia and Europe
  
  
• South America may become a major market and supplier to the world if social and political issues can be addressed
  
  
• Africa will remain a backwater despite significant markets and resources due to political instability and AIDS

Nothing is set in stone... but the indication are all there for those interested enough to look.

2020 Preparations - Step 3: Population Impact - 2

Yesterday I reviewed population facts. Today let's look at the implications:

• China and India will have a combined population approaching 3 billion by 2020 making that part of the world the highest density marketplace.
• There will be extremes of income - destitute to immensely wealthy
• There will be a rapidly growing consumer base
• There will be great demand for the world's resources
• There will be intense global competition for a piece of both countries' expanding markets
  
• There are significant risks of an AIDS pandemic among the poor
• Europe may have significant social problems with the great Muslim influx as well as significant strains on many countries' social programs
• Europe will benefit from relatively cheap Muslim labor
• Europe will be distracted by social unrest
• The U.S. will continue to have an increasing Hispanic population
• There will be growing pressure to "Quebecize"... create a side-by-side society rather than an integrated one
  
• There will be pressures on social support programs as a lower percentage of the population seeks college educations... or even graduates from high school
  
• The economy will remain strong due to population growth, but manufacturing will be a smaller percentage of the total economy and more focus on the service sector
  
• There is a great likelihood that the U.S. will begin to look more to Latin and South American markets for reciprocal trade (my conclusion) as the Hispanic population increases

It is not unreasonable to accept the possibility of an "Americas" focus emerging as the situation becomes more chaotic in Europe and Asia.

I believe the political and population dynamics will lead to the following:

• The U.S. will become increasingly disenchanted with involvement in Muslim-initiated issues which will dominate the European and Russian areas and will force Europe and Russia to have greater roles in addressing Islamic activism
  
• The U.S. citizens, businesses, and politicians will become increasingly disenchanted with lopsided trade balances and unethical practices by China and curtail efforts to be a major part of China's markets
  
• The U.S. will increasingly see India as the key player in its Asian trade efforts and promote Indian development to offset both the Muslim and Chinese influences.
• The U.S. will see Latin and South America as "natural" trading partners and increase efforts to build greater ties politically and economically.

FYI...

APPROXIMATE MILES FROM CHICAGO

Mexico City	1700	Rio de Janeiro	5300
Caracas	2500	Buenos Aires	5600
Paris	4100	Beijing	6600
Munich	4500	Hong Kong	7800
Moscow	5000	Bombay	8100

2020 Preparations - Step 3: Population Impact

One of the dynamics affecting international affairs over the next 15 years as we progress toward 2020 will be changing populations.

• China and India approaching 1.5 billion people each; India with no discernible population control; China with an aging population
• Europe with a static indigenous population and an influx of Muslim immigrants
• A broad swath of moderate to high growth through the Mediterranean and West/Central/SE Asia
  
• Japan aging and static population
• Moderate to high growth in South and Central America
• High growth in Mexico with an Hispanic influx into southern tier U.S.
• Russia and sub-Saharan Africa with the possibility of decline populations because of disease and political instability
  

The map below is based on my interpretation of the CIA paper on 2020, but I think it tells the picture: the U.S., Europe, and Japan... current economic leaders... will be faced with different, but important population challenges. The U.S. and Europe may face serious cultural conflicts between the older and newer populations.

India's growth may continue unabated due to its young population and increasing national wealth. China's one-child policy will eventually create an aging, static population unless the policy is repealed.



For more on China's aging population, see this morning's Detroit Free Press.

2020 Preparations - Step 2: Economic Challenges 2

Yesterday was one example of how we are creating our own economic competition in China. On Saturday's post, I spoke of adapting to the new "rules of engagement" by not trying to match low wages, but by education... matching wits.

The U.S. is China's biggest external customer. It is time they stop "disrespecting" us... it is time that we assert ourselves while we can. What does China want and need?

• Our technology
• Our markets
• Our knowledge base... including access to our universities

So you may ask yourself: "Does the U.S. have any leverage in dealing with an unethical, unprincipled China. Go back and read the bullet points again.

Our businesses tell themselves that they "need" Chinese labor. Not totally true. They can take advantage of cheap Chinese labor under ethical rules of engagement. Otherwise, the payment is far too high. India is a better alternative if cheap labor is the only price of doing business that drives U.S. corporations to seek outsourced manufacturing. India does have the British rule of law. Indians generally speak English and Indians have shown themselves to be reasonably reliable in business dealings.

China may be a tempting market, but its government is a major negative because it does not protect the intellectual rights of other nations doing business within its borders. Quite simply, we do not need China or its markets at the price presently being paid.

Here's a thought: allow U.S. companies whose products have been pirated to sue in U.S. courts and prove their cases. While it may not stop what is going on in China, it could be used in the court of world opinion against Chinese practices and... if the Chinese should ever want to export any of those products or components of the products to the U.S., they could be fined substantially or all products confiscated and destroyed.

Or... simply cancel China's "most favored nation" status. No, that might be too appropriate for our politicians to consider... especially many whose constituents have their hands in this cookie jar because of the access to China's huge markets. Perhaps when enough big businesses are burned, attitudes will change. After all, what good is access when all that mean is the U.S. will teach China all it knows so that China can undermine the U.S.? ... us.

2020 Preparations - Step 2: Economic Challenges

According to GM China, the similarities between its Spark minicar and Chinese Chery Automobile Corp.'s QQ model are more than just mere coincidence. In fact, if you examine the automobiles, they are virtually identical.

*****

"Chinese officials were demanding more advanced technology than seemed appropriate or necessary to Chrysler," concluded the Commerce report.

Chrysler was at that time the maker of the U.S. Army M-1 tank.

Chrysler officials quickly realized the advanced assembly and manufacturing technology demanded by the Chinese was far more applicable to making armored vehicles such as the U.S. Army M-1 tank than vans for soccer moms.

*****

Audi, the German car maker, also had a sweet deal with China to manufacture its very popular 5000 sedan during the 1990s. However, once the terms of the deal expired, Audi was hustled out of China.

Suddenly, the same Beijing car maker began producing the "Red Flag" sedan. The Red Flag was identical to the Audi 5000 right down to the last nut and bolt - with the single exception of a plastic red-flag hood ornament.

*****

The U.S. companies that so heartily supported open trade with China are now beginning to regret the deals they made with Beijing. Tyrants don't have to play fair or by the rules. GM, Chrysler and others are learning as they pay the financial penalty of a fools bargain.

Charles R. Smith

Perhaps it is time to examine how we "partner" with our competitors.

"Outsourcing" is a two-edged sword when it comes to China. We get cheaper goods because of low-cost labor. They get our designs and technology.

So is "outsourcing" really cheaper or are we just borrowing from our future? It's hard to put an entry on a spreadsheet under the heading of "pirated knowledge".

2020 Preparations - Step 1: Education (Continuing?)

Yesterday, one of the leverage points I suggested was alternative education paths to the traditional high school/college path. It's not a new idea... just one that was abandoned by most school districts. The charts below depict the education failure rates for those school districts. I point the finger at the districts because they have not responded to the real crisis in American education... almost 1/3 of our children do not receive an education that prepares them for adult life.

Rather than being prepared for well-paying trades or crafts, we allow our children to simply walk away from the educational system. That's education failure in a nutshell. And, if present statistics remain unchanged by ethnic groups, the growth of our minority populations will heighten the problem.

Click on the graphs below to see the data details.

2020 Preparations - Step 1: Education (continued)

Yesterday, I proposed tax incentives for U.S. citizens seeking PhDs. It's really not so much that they would be incentives as investments by the government in our nation's future.

• PhDs would have far greater earnings potential returning those initial tax breaks back to the government in later years
• PhDs would have a far greater potential for developing revolutionary ideas that could be translated into U.S. business competitive advantages... more production... more employement

Working backward from the top, it is evident from enrollment data that the U.S. colleges are enjoying a brisk business. A large part of our population certainly recognizes the advantages of a college degree or and advanced degree. However, by the time a student reaches the age of 24 or 25, the pool of those considering PhDs drops off considerably. It's like never-ending medical school. So, the smoother the process and the greater support to get to the top, the more will get there.

Nearly everyone recognizes the problems facing high schools and elementary schools:

• reduced funding
• segments of the community without a bias toward education
• few alternatives for gaining non-academic skills; bias against those who seek alternative educations
• not everyone is suited tempermentally or intellectually for college
• the community and businesses need people who are both skilled and disciplined to do other work; e.g. tool makers, carpenters, electricians

We presume that to be economically successful, one must go to college. We ignore those who can be contributers in other ways and let them stumble along until they do or do not find a place in the productive community.

Consequently, it seems to me that the two greatest leverage points for improving U.S. education and U.S. competitiveness lie in :

• Focusing on increasing the number of PhDs among U.S. citizens
• Focusing on high school education that provides a good alternative for those not interested in pursuing a college education, but would do well in skilled trades or crafts

Got better ideas?

2020 Preparations - Step 1: Education

The rest of the world isn't going to turn back the clock so that the U.S. can continue to be unchallenged militarily, economically and intellectually.

It seems to me that the U.S. must begin to adapt to the new rules of engagement. It should be obvious that it is not in our best interest to try to match the ridiculously low wages driving manufacturing out of this country. That would be self-defeating. But we can make it harder for other nations to compete with us intellectually.

I sent the following letter last September and it is one possibility:

Rep. John Boehner, Chairman
Committee on Education and the Workforce
U. S. House of Representatives
2181 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515

Subject:Expanding America’s Intellectual Resource

Increasingly, the ranks of our universities PhD programs are being populated with students from other nations. While diversity of opinion, experience, and skills are valuable, I believe that such diversity already exists within the tens of millions of American-born potential PhDs. The fact that a company such as Microsoft feels compelled to seek Chinese PhDs for their research staff while, at the same time, U.S. universities’ PhD programs are so heavily populated with foreign students sends a message to me that our system of education is failing to focus on American intellectual resources: U.S. citizen students.

The point of my concern is this: the U.S. is losing manufacturing and technology jobs to lower cost labor suppliers, and the argument is that this is not serious because these jobs will be replaced by better paying ones based on the U.S. becoming the wellspring of new ideas. There is no guarantee that the foreign PhD students will stay here when booming economies in their native lands offer them the chance to become part of the elite there. I would argue that without support for creating the home-grown expertise, the U.S. eventually may be relegated to just another country that had a glorious past.

I propose a simple incentive to create a more favorable environment for students: allow students who are U.S. citizens at the time they enter a PhD program and who work in the U.S. for five years immediately after receiving their PhDs a tax break. This tax break would be very simple: average the last five years of income prior to receiving the PhD and then average that with the income received over the next five years. For example, if the average income during the last five years of the PhD program was $20,000 and the income over each of the five years following was $100,000 (for simplicity), then the taxable income before any other adjustments would be $120,000/2 or $60,000. At a 25% tax rate, that would be an annual incentive of $10,000 ($100,000 minus $60,000 times 0.25). Over five years, that would be a savings of $50,000 which could be used to offset some of the costs of pursuing a PhD.

This incentive could well be the difference between a U.S. student deciding to pursue a PhD or deciding that the burden of pursuing one is too great.

Unfortunately, Rep. Boehner was too busy to respond or acknowledge receipt of the letter.

If you wish you can also contact Rep. Boehner at:

1011 Longworth H.O.B.
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-6205

Or you can simply copy the letter above and send it to Rep. Boehner with your signature.

2020 - What could go wrong?

Everything.

The CIA paper to which I have been referring does recognize that political and economic forecasting is much less reliable than weather forecasting. Things can go wrong:

• War between China and Taiwan - probably very short and disastrous politically for China
  
• War between India and Pakistan - likelihood of nuclear weapons being used and other nations being involved
• Collapse of sub-Saharan Africa - disease and unstable governments are a dangerous combination
• Creation of an Islamic pseudo-empire - radical Islamists acting outside of traditional governments and national boundaries gain power through terror... Islamic Mafia.
  
• Widespread availability of nuclear weapons - any country might become an nuclear power through covert means... making the world a far more unstable place.

The world is changing and the U.S. will have to adapt... but continue to lead. What are some of the options?

We'll look at that....

Meanwhile, as predicted by global warming models...

Glaciers in Michigan are forecasted to retreat at an accelerated pace. After only two weeks, glaciers are beginning to show signs of melting. Animal life may return to this desolated area.

Economics - Trade deficit

Follow-up to my February 1 post. Although I have not combined the trade deficit with the budget deficit into some total number, I have stated that I believed they are both indicators of economic structural weaknesses that this nation will be forced to face. Back on November 6, I started writing about excessive spending as part of my post-election focuses and said:

Perhaps it is unfair to lump the national debt and trade deficits together as "borrowing", but the trade deficit does one thing that leaves me just a little paranoid... especially at 1/2 trillion dollars per year... and that is the issue of control. Somewhere in the equation of getting goods for cash is the part that says Cash = Control. Cash becomes the power to influence, the power to compete, and the power to control.

Don Beaudroux at Cafe Hayek (named after Friedrich Hayek) wrote:

In his book Exporting America, Lou Dobbs writes

Our trade deficits and budget deficits are soaring, together amounting to a trillion dollars a year [p. 30].

The ‘trade deficit’ is a deficit in the current-account. When America has a trade deficit, nothing more ominous is happening than the fact that Americans are importing more goods and services (in value terms) than Americans are exporting. Foreigners earning dollars by selling goods and services to Americans are investing some of their dollars in dollar-denominated assets – mostly stocks, bonds, real-estate, and cash.

So why does Dobbs think that this sum is meaningful? Answer: he mistakenly equates the current-account deficit with debt. It’s not debt.

All well and good... the definition is clarified. The question is not in the definition, but the significance of the trade deficit. Of that, there is much dispute... as Yoda might say.

The Cato Institute agreed with Dr. Boudreaux... or at least did in 1998. By 2004, others were not so sure, as reported in the New York Times.

Not only are many U.S. economists concerned about the trade deficit, there are a growing number of voices elsewhere in the world expressing concern. For example, John Quiggin, a Federation Fellow in Economics and Political Science at the University of Queensland, wrote in The Economists' Voice

Currently the United States imports about half as much again as it exports. Without radical changes in the U.S. economy, or specific policy initiatives on energy, a large deficit on oil imports can be taken as a given. There are important classes of consumer goods for which domestic production has ceased. If balance is to be reached in a decade, there has to be a major turnaround in the pattern of trade in some other sector. But what? At the moment, there is no sector in which the United States is currently running a significant surplus (there is a small surplus on services, but even here, the trend is flat or negative). Even with the recent depreciation of the U.S. dollar, and widely-noted productivity growth, there are no signs that U.S. producers are gaining market share in any part of the traded goods sector.

Any significant reduction in the imbalance on goods and services therefore appears likely to require very large changes in market prices or U.S. income levels, such as:
• A (further) larger devaluation of the U.S. dollar.
• Large reductions in U.S. wages relative to those overseas.
• Large increases in U.S. productivity relative to foreign productivity (the relevant concept here is multi-factor productivity, taking account of both capital and labor inputs).
• Large reductions in U.S. consumption relative to foreign consumption.

Unfortunately, no one of these alone would be enough to get the trade deficit in balance or surplus without a crisis.

...
It is inevitable that the U.S. trade account will return to balance, and likely that most of this adjustment will take place within the next ten years. The only question for policy is whether the adjustment will be relatively smooth, like the process which resolved the first U.S. trade deficit blowout in the 1980s, or sharp and costly, as in the case of the many countries that experienced financial crises in the 1990s.

What, me worry?

2020 - Beyond nations

There have been alliances for millennia. Nations sign treaties for mutual benefit or simply to spell out how they will behave with each other. A phenomenon was reborn in the late 20th century: virtual nations or empires.

So far, the impact of these empires without geography is minimal. The most important has been Muslim terrorist organizations such as Al Qaida. They use the technology of the internet to hold together individuals dispersed around the world. They are held together by an idea rather than physical borders.

Now, I say this phenomenon was "reborn" because quasi-governments have been around for a long time. Most religious faiths were not confined to national territories for very long. What is new is the means to "govern" these virtual nations or empires. Instant communication allows for unprecedented control and action. Virtual armies and banks are now available for use anywhere. This is the "reborn" version of the Knights Templar.

This "virtual empire" capability can allow groups to rise and spread quickly causing difficulties for real-world nations. If you are attacked, where do you retaliate? If you capture members of the virtual empire, you are faced with similar members in another location who can quickly take the place of the others.

Globalization... changing demographics... virtual empires... a different world in 2020.

Economics - Who's yo daddy?

• Brazil posted a record trade surplus of $33.7 billion in 2004
• China's trade surplus to a six-year high of $31.98 billion in 2004
• India's trade surplus with US has more than tripled in the last decade and is likely to top $10 billion this year (2004)
  

"...the 2004 U.S. trade deficit, will exceed $600 billion. That led the dollar to reach a new low against the euro in 2004."

Now you know.

More on 2020 to come.