Philosophy: Tongue In... Tongue Out
Remember that these are generalities.... Individuals experience a mixture of input from environment, groups and personal experiences. But to the extent that we allow ourselves to be labeled as part of a group... "Republicans", "Democrats", "beer lovers"... we allow ourselves to be influenced by "group think". We all do it.
I'm a "sports fan" which means that I enjoy watching a variety of activities defined as sports... football, golf, beach volleyball (okay, my wife draws the line there). Sports don't appeal to everyone... there are the mentally ill and those who spend most of their time looking at or drawing inexplicable shapes described as art... who simply don't understand the metaphorical aspects of sports and how sports allows peaceful interaction among groups.
It really doesn't matter what the particular sport is. There are only two types of sport: team (armies facing off) and individual (facing life's challenges).
Football and "futbol" are great examples of how groups rally the emotions of their members. The "soldiers" (team members) lock in battle (the game) while the support troops (coaches, trainers, bus drivers) ensure that the soldiers have what they need to face the enemy (the other team). The citizens (fans) provide critical resources (money, noise, scantily clad women) to ensure that the soldiers and support troops can complete their mission (win the game) without the enemy having an advantage (except the home field).
Golf is a metaphor of man versus life's challenges. You can never quite overcome all of the challenges (the courses), but you can become skilled enough (good off the tee... great putter) to top other golfers occasionally. But no matter how good you become, eventually your game will let you down and others will take your place as the "leader".
Sports also simplifies "good" and "evil". Other team is always evil.
Sports simplifies "fair" and "unfair". A call that goes our way is fair.
I still have a little trouble with "right" and "wrong" though. I was watching the Purdue-Wisconsin football game and saw a Wisconsin player hurt by a Purdue player who dove at the lower leg of the Wisconsin player... a "chop block"... perfectly "legal", but somehow it seemed "wrong". Why, well, it seems like the intent of that action goes beyond the goal of impeding the progress of the opponent to injuring the opponent. The argument that it isn't "wrong" because it is "legal" and, therefore, should be expected. But realistically, the chop block was delivered in a way that prevented the opposing player from expecting it or protecting himself from it. So, the injured Wisconsin player had to leave the game and stay out. Ultimately, I felt that "God punished Purdue" for the chop block because Wisconsin won the game....
Isn't that how we feel when we overcome our foes?
Okay, it's time to remove my tongue from my cheek and go look at some inexplicable shapes created by some guy with a bad beard and dirty fingernails.